The Israeli-Palestinian conflict that has embittered the people of the Middle East and elsewhere for the past half-century is rooted in two powerful and contradictory claims to the same territory. Each of the two parties invokes history and love of the land in defense of its claims. Beginning in the 1890s European Jews, responding to an upsurge of anti-Semitic prejudice, organized the Zionist movement in order to establish a “national home” in Palestine. At that time Palestine was part of the Ottoman Empire and was inhabited largely by Arab Muslims. In the years following World War I, when the British ruled Palestine as a League of Nations Mandate, European Jews began to migrate to Palestine in large numbers, a process greatly accelerated during the and after World War II due to the Holocaust. The withdrawal of the British from Palestine and the proclamation of the independent state of Israel in 1948 made the Zionist dream a reality.Palestine, however, had been part of the Arab Muslim world since the 7th century. Palestinians resented the coming of the Jewish colonists and they opposed the founding of the new Israeli state, as did most other Arabs in the region. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were forced into exile in the late 1940s, victims of the conflicts surrounding the establishment of the Israeli state. Subsequent wars between Israel and neighboring Arab states in 1967, 1973, and 1982 increased the amount of territory—and the number of Palestinians—subject to Israeli authority, most notably in the region west of the Jordan River known as the West Bank, and in the Gaza Strip.
Determined to regain their homeland and to establish an independent Palestinian state (sentiments that constitute a kind of “Zionism in reverse”), in 1964 Palestinian leaders founded the Palestine Liberation Organization. The PLO was initially popular among ordinary Palestinians and is still the leading Palestinian political organization. However, since the late 1980s Hamas (the Islamic Resistance Movement), which combines religious and political goals, has emerged as a serious rival of the PLO for the leadership of the Palestinian cause. Like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Hamas has established a huge network of educational and social welfare institutions as a step toward the establishment of an independent Palestine based on Islamic law.
Hamas has also played a leading role in carrying out a variety of violent actions, including suicide bombings, aimed at ending Israeli rule over the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Viewers of television news reports are well aware of the harsh repression carried out by the Israeli military forces against the Palestinian intifada (literally, a “shaking off”) in recent years (as recently as the early part of 2009). Each side sees its use of violence as justified by the wrongs committed by the other. The situation has deteriorated to the point that a wall was built around the West Bank and completed in 2007 (you can read the BBC News piece on that by clicking here).
The documents that I would like you to read are a mixture of personal statements, official proclamations, and maps (you can read all of them by clicking here). In the first piece Nahum Goldman, an early Zionist from Germany, discusses his first visit to Palestine in 1913. The document that follows is the 1948 Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel. In the third document, Fawaz Turki, a Palestinian writer, recalls his family’s flight from Palestine in 1948 and his subsequent childhood as an exile. The fourth document is the Palestinian National Charter, which was issued by the Palestinian National Congress in 1968. Two maps that help to clarify the major territorial changes from the 1940s through the present can also be viewed by clicking here for the early map and here for the current.
After reading the documents and studying the maps, I would like you to reflect on and discuss the following: How do the documents and the maps illuminate the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians? Why did Nahum Goldman decide to go to Palestine in 1913, and remain there after his friends retuned home to Germany? What kinds of contacts did Goldman have with Palestinian Arabs? What reasons does the 1948 Israeli Declaration provide for the establishment of the new state? How is the matter of the indigenous Arab/Palestinian population addressed? What does Fawaz Turki reveal about the standard of living in the Palestinian refugee camps? What attitudes did Turki encounter in the host countries where the refugee camps were located? How does Turki explain the growing strength of Palestinian nationalism? What do you think of his view that Western countries are partly responsible for the conflicts in the Middle East? How does the 1968 Palestinian National Charter compare with the 1948 Israeli Declaration? Based on your reading of these two documents, do you see any hope for compromise? What is the relationship between Israeli and Palestinian nationalism in other parts of the world? What similarities and differences do you see? What has been the trend since 1914 regarding conflicts between people of different nationalities and religions? Have the conflicts ebbed and flowed, increased overall, stayed the same, or decreased overall? How do you explain this? How does the Israeli-Palestinian conflict compare with ethnic conflict in the Balkans? What do the maps suggest about the reasons for the intensity of the present-day conflict between the Palestinians and the Israelis? What have been the big changes since the 1940s? How do you explain the changes? How might the maps be used to propose a resolution of the conflict? Is the solution the establishment of an independent Palestine adjacent to Israel? What areas would the borders of a Palestinian state include? Or, should there be one “bi-national” state that includes Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza, with all of their current residents? Your thoughts…

9 comments:
oh my goodness. i decided to ask my parents if they knew about this wall and they said no! this wall is clearily a strong division between isreal and palestine. the fact that one side has somewhat been turned into a 'ghetto' is just scary to think about. i guess you never realize what division like this can do to societies..
and to know this was completed only 2 years ago?! it really scares me to think that people really think a wall will solve problems like this.
the fact of the matter being that this wall was not stopped when we had an idea of how it would bring change to the surronding area and the problems it brings within the society.
oh and when i was talking to my sister about this, she immediately said that it was wrong of me to care because im not arab or jewish. i knew at that point that you really have to be motivated to care about things around the world.
wow. the story from the famly's perspective really made me think. usually, when we hear bad news, the natural reaction is to supress it and only deal with it if you have to but reading this i acctually thought about it. both sides have a good claim. the first reaction i had was, let the Jewish people have a home because they have nowhere else to go, whereas the arabs do. but then the story from an arab famly really sets in and forcing untold numbers to move doesn't sound right either. now i'm stuck.
i will say though, there's never going to be a peacfull answer to this problem, try as they might. both sides are very dedicated.
about the wall, i don't realy see the point of walls. they just cause more problems than they solve. you have to worry about transportation issues as well as the people's reactions. walls will always piss sombody off and in war, why make even more peaople pissed? i just don't see the point off walls. and when they're ineffective, you gotta tear it down and THAT causes trouble too. the conflict just never ends.
Nahum Goldman went to Palestine on a school trip and stayed there long after the others left. He wanted to experience more of this Palestine and to feel what it was really like to be 'home' for he was a Zionist as well and described this place just emitting Jewish history and how this land really belongs to the Jews. Goldman kinda of crashed, or more observed Arab culture, a wedding while the bride was dancing, which is apparently illegal for foreigners to watch. Goldman being referred to as a foreigner in what he calls his 'homeland' shows how the Arabs at this point live here and call this place home. Already we can see controversy brewing. The main reason is that these Jews really deserve a place to call home. They have to not only escape the horrors of the Nazis but they've been through even more than that. They were kicked out of their homeland but kept their faith and mentioned the Balfour Declaration and how it "reaffirmed in the Mandate of the League of Nations which, in particular, gave
international sanction to the historic connection between the Jewish people and
Eretz-Israel and to the right of the Jewish people to rebuild its national home." This new State of Israel is to be kind and friendly to their neighbors and "appeal...to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate
in the upbuilding of the state on the basis of full and equal citizenship and
due representation in all its provisional and permanent institutions." Maybe they did want to keep peace, or they were just saying that to be nice but I don't think the Jews really had any caring thoughts about the Arabs.
The host countries disrespected and looked down on the refugees. Like you said in class, these refugees are a constant reminder of Arab defeat and brings shame. His blond hair signifies that his mother is a 'whore' and he's a two-bit Palestinian who is pretty much no good. Hearing how they dreamed of food instead of having the 'I want to be a doctor' dream really shows how terrible conditions in these camps were. We dream of wealth and more, while Turki dreams of a bed and food that will last for a week.
Palestinian nationalism is growing due to two things: "the
preservation of our memory of Palestine and our acquisition of education." He was taught to be proud to be Palestinian and not to be ashamed. So the more he was put down, the more pride was instilled upon him.
The 1968 Palestinian National Charter says straight forward that they need to be armed in order to liberate their people and show their "absolute determination." Also, this charter says that the partition of Palestine and creation of Israel were completely illegal. And Zionists living in this land now will be considered Palestinian, which probably makes the Jews angrier. "Claims of historical or religious
ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history and the
true conception of what constitutes statehood. Judaism, being a religion, is not an
independent nationality. Nor do Jews constitute a single nation with an identity of
its own; they are citizens of the states to which they belong." The charter basically states that the Jews do not have a legitimate reason to claim this land theirs. In the end, the charter claims the Zionists to be 'imperialist', aggressive, and repressive. Because of these bad qualities, other nations should help liberate the Palestinians and being them back home. Based on these two documents, I really can't see any compromise. Especially in the Palestinian National Charter where everything was straightforward. Number 22 and 33 are probably the biggest factors of these two not being able to find compromise.
Wow that took a long time to read and digest, but it was definitely worth it.
It was a little long, but i too have gained more understanding on the reasons why they have anamocity toward one another.
Long time no blog...You see the view from both angles in these documents as well as reasons for animosity towards one another. The Arab perspective with the document about having to leave his homeland and live in a life of poverty because of Jewish migrations and the violence irrupting in the region. It seems that both sides have reasons for wanting the territory and it shows the suffering that each has had to endure, most of it falling on the Arabs in recent years. It really makes you rethink what you thought about the situation and what our media seems to propose about it and the popular opinion towards it.
its like everything bad that ever happened kept falling on top of each other until this happened. farming and industrialization, then self-determination, messed up promises (silly Britain), the holocaust...
the camps were not good in any way. it seems like even though the palestinean family was starving, they were happier than when they were in the camps. the Jews and Arabs didnt get a long, and for something to actually change over there i think they need to start bringing people together. by the way the people are acting no compromise is going to be accepted, so i dont see any change coming for a while.
i need to look at the maps now so i'll be back in a few minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_fE5uh92dw
I found this video on You Tube
It's by a Palestinian Group who are definetly pro-Independent Palestine, not really so much are the lyrics as important as are some of the images shown.
the newer map is even WORSE than the old one!! the wall is absolutely horrible and needs to go before anyone can get anywhere in this situation. the people are getting too greedy and need to learn to work together, everything to do with the beginnings of war either starts like that (the whole we want it all) or alliances (which are really part of the whole we want it all b/c they are formed to gain more of power or goods or something.) i definately see the issues of facing the problem though because even i'm getting mad just thinking about it. it's even worse that all the countries that have the power to destroy all human life will jump into a war if someone makes a stupid mistake. AGH! i don't see why they can't stop worrying about the land and start figureing out a PEACEFUL solution. oh and now i remember that alliances were formed and are still in place. i just want to smack some sense into people. havent they ever thought about looking at the past?
are there any other things to look at on this issue mr prill? if i have time i want to get more educated on the subject...
oh! and i'm really sorry that i was dozing in class today! i managed to stay awake and take notes, i just had a sleep deprived weekend...
well hopefully we never have a wall in the US cuz it seems to almost cause more problems with a wall than without one... i thought that we already learned from the berlin wall that it is wrong to separate people like that? well i guess not... once again we all do what is best for us and not for the best of other countries
Post a Comment