Thursday, April 2, 2009

The Literature of Hope and Oppression

Africans found colonialism dispiriting and repugnant because so much of it was predicated on the assumption of black inferiority. Colonialism’s message, stated or unstated, was that Africans were incapable of governing themselves, or at least incapable of governing themselves effectively; nor were they capable of managing a modern economy or even creating a viable culture and social order. For all these tasks they needed Europeans, who justified their authority by asserting their moral and intellectual superiority. Furthermore, Africans were told that in order to succeed under colonialism—to become clerks or civil servants in the colonial administration or to become “assimilated” (an evolué, or “evolved one”) in French Africa—they would have to shed their African identity and adopt the ideas, views, work habits, dress, and customs of Europeans. This was the price Africans would have to pay to overcome their backwardness.

When organized African nationalist movements finally began to take shape after World War II, many African political leaders denounced the corrosive effect of colonialism on African tradition and on the Africans’ sense of identity. Well before then, however, African poets, novelists, and short story writers, as well as black authors living outside of Africa, had explored these issues with great power and insight. These authors were for the most part European educated, wrote mainly in English or French, and brought to their work a familiarity with contemporary European literary trends. Their themes and emotions, however, centered on what it meant to be black after centuries of enslavement and years of colonial rule. Many French-language writers came to be identified with the Paris-centered literary movement known as Négritude, which, beginning in the 1930s, affirmed the worth of African tradition, emphasized the spiritual unity black people everywhere, and explored black people’s unique historical experience. English-speaking writers tended to focus less on the commonalities of blacks’ oppression and more on ways colonialism affected specific groups and individuals. Both groups expressed pride in Africa’s spiritual, physical, and cultural heritage and mourned the wounds inflicted on it by slavery, colonialism, underdevelopment, and prejudice.

I would like you to read four short documents (by clicking here) that each offer a different African perspective on the experience of colonialism. “Parable of the Eagle” was written by James Aggrey, who was born in 1875 in the Gold Coast, a British colony. Educated in a Protestant mission school and a convert to Christianity, at age twenty-three he traveled to the United States to study for the ministry. He remained in the United States for twenty years, studying economics and agriculture, speaking out against racial prejudice, and working among poor African-Americans in South Carolina. He returned to Africa in 1918 and died in 1927.

The author of the second work, “Limbo,” is Léon G. Damas, one of several black writers of the 1930s and 1940s who was born outside of Africa but who nonetheless identified with Africa and wrote eloquently about the damage caused by colonialism. Born in 1912 in French Guyana, a colony in South America, Damas was educated in Martinique, a French Caribbean island, before beginning studies at the University of Paris. At Paris, Damas, with fellow students Léopold Senghor from Senegal and Aimé Césaire from Martinique, founded the literary journal L’étudiant noir (The Black Student), which many see as the beginning of the Négritude movement. Damas’ poem “Limbo” was one of thirty-one poems published in the anthology Pigments in 1937. According to Christian tradition, Limbo refers to the abode of souls who are barred from Heaven because they have been unbaptized, hence a place of neglect and oblivion. After World War II, in which Damas fought for the French, he worked for the United Nations in Africa and then emigrated to the United States, where he taught black literature at Federal City University and Howard University in Washington, D.C.

The second poem, “Prayer for Peace,” is the work of Léopold Sédar Senghor, the most famous French-speaking poet of Africa. Born in Senegal, Senghor was raised a Catholic and educated in Catholic schools. At age twenty-two he went to Paris, where he studied and taught literature and helped inspire the Négritude movement. After World War II, in which he fought for France and was taken prisoner by the Germans, he entered politics and was elected to the French Chamber of Deputies. When Senegal became an independent state in 1960, he was elected president, an office held until he retired in 1981. His “Prayer for Peace” was the concluding poem of his collection Hosties Noires, which can be translated either as Black Victims or Black Hosts. It is set in January 1945, after France had been liberated and the final defeat of the Nazis was imminent. In the poem he enumerates the sins of colonialism but combines his condemnation with a plea for forgiveness and universal brotherhood. It is a powerful expression of the poet’s ambivalence toward France, both the oppressor of Africa and a beacon of enlightenment.

The final poem, “Vultures,” is by David Diop, who flourished as a poet at the end of the colonial period. Born in France to a Senegalese father and a Cameroonian mother, in his twenties he left medical school to study literature and write poetry. Acclaimed in French-speaking Africa for his denunciations of colonialism, he moved to Senegal in 1958 after French rule ended. He died in 1960 in a plane crash. “Vultures” was published in 1956 in the anthology Coups de Pilon, or Hammer Blows.

After reading the documents, I would like you to reflect on and discuss the following: What specific features of colonialism does each author condemn? How are their views of colonialism similar? How are they different? How do the four authors view Africans and African culture? In what ways do they find positive value in African practices and traditions? What specific criticisms do the authors make of European values and characteristics? In what ways do they believe that African ways are superior to those of Europe? To what degree do the four works offer a message of hope to Africa? Your thoughts…

9 comments:

Theresa Dang said...

i didn't understand the first one until the very end. The eagle represents a black person & the owner of the eagle is a white slave owner for colonist. The man said that he trained the eagle to be a chicken so it would not fly, but another person said that the eagle still has the heart of an eagle. So in the end of that, i guess it means that a person will always be a person and not owned by anyone. The second poem was kinda different to me. i think that the black dolls are black people. The third poems or prayers were to different things. There was even a pray for France even though France is part of Europe and brought "death and guns" to the villages. One of the prayers also sounded like they wanted to "embrace the earth in a band of brotherly hands" (which is with everyone).

Caleb Johnson said...

In all 4 documents, they use graphic terms about how the Europeans had taken over them. In the prayer especially, he talks about over and over, all the things white men had done. And then he prayed for France? It think he was saying that France wanted to do the right thing, but there was peer pressure.

Henry A. said...

I like how they use geography to truly show how they were being dominated. it showed the true white man,

Nicole Gustafson said...

Very thoughtful. I liked very much Aggrey's Eagles comparison. That can be used to relate many other occurances. These all give hope, and speak of hope to the Africans. They speak of the horrible things white people have done to them, but Senghor wants to forgive, Damas wants his back, Diop has hope and mentions revolt, and Aggrey wants to FLY.

Anonymous said...

James Aggrey, Parable of the Eagle- says that the Africans are taught to be something they aren’t. When they have the chance to be what they really are, they don’t follow it because they have been taught to be something else. It only takes a little hope though to make them find themselves and free themselves from this type of “slavery” (Its not exactly what most people might call it but to me it kinda fits sice they are deprived of there freedom).
Leon G. Damas, Limbo- Asking for his life back, his culture, and everything that defines him. The imperialists took it from him and he wants it back.
Leopold Sedar Senghor, Prayer for Peace- Although he has much hate and rage from his family’s past, he asks god to forgive those who have done wrong. He specially wants France to be first because she has done a lot more terrible things.
David Diop, Vultures- talks about some of the harsh, inhumane things that happened. He even calls them “Strange men who were not men”

Monica Enlow said...

the first author doesn't denounce any europeans, he merely wants to incite nationalism in his contemporaries. the second one seems to have more of a view that the europeans came and uprooted the africans, merely using the africans as their little play toys. the third excerpt was interesting because it is a "Prayer to the Lord", which seems interesting that a struggling african nationalist movement would bring christianity into this. [but someone had to right?] the third one says that he does not want to hate the europeans, but he wants to continue his journey toward nationalistic goals. the fourth one is about the europeans introducing industrial equipment and processes and how they have overshadowed traditional african ways.

i think these probably brought a greater cause for nationalism because it's something that people can understand and feel emotion in. the folk story was my favorite!

Anonymous said...

the first document talked about the opression f native africans as they were turned into "chickens" who couldn't fly or in regular terms be free. the second talked about identity and a person demanding his identity back.
the third talked of forgiveness of the colonialists by god. i thought this was too nice, but hey..
the fourth is totally opposite of the third as it shows the monstrous nature of the colonialists, described as vultures i think.

The Odyssey said...

in these four documents it shows a picture in youe head of how the europeans took over there country and it is very graphic and brutal.. in these articles it seems that France is tryin or is goin to do the right thing or somethin like that because he prays? for them... thats random and strange but ok but these articles show how bad it was for the africans

Sean Cox said...

I think these stories represent Africas repression accuratly. I like the comparison with the eagle. But the eagle flew again. I hope Africa can fly again too.