Thursday, February 5, 2009

Images of Imperialism in Great Britain

Although late-nineteenth-century imperialism had its critics, there is no doubt that in the major imperialist states it had broad support, not just from investors, missionary groups, and civil servants who had direct interests in Africa and Asia but also from the general populace. Imperialism had this appeal for several reasons. For many it confirmed their faith in progress and their belief in the superiority of white, Christian Europeans over the rest of the world’s peoples. For ardent nationalists it was an endeavor that tested and demonstrated the nation’s strength and vigor. For those who found their lives in industrial society drab and tedious, it provided vicarious adventure, excitement, and a sense of the exotic.

Late-nineteenth-century popular culture provides ample evidence of the public’s enthusiasm for imperialism. Especially in Great Britain, the premier imperialist power, novels, poetry, plays, children’s books, advertisements, music hall entertainment, and publications of missionary societies were filled with positive imperialist images, themes, and motifs. Youth organizations such as the Boy Scouts (founded in 1908) and the Girl Guides (founded in 1910) sought to inculcate the values of service to Britain’s imperial cause. This constant exposure of the public to material connected with the British Empire reinforced imperialism’s appeal and strengthened support for the government’s expansionist policies.

The documents I would like you to look at are actually all visual and provide several examples of how British popular culture propagated imperial values (you can view them all by clicking here). The first group of illustrations appeared in An ABC for Baby Patriots by Mrs. Earnest Ames. Designed to be read to young children, it was published in 1898 in London and went through several printings. The illustration that accompanies the letter N depicts a British naval officer showing off a flotilla of Royal Navy ships on maneuvers off Spithead in the English Channel. The foreigners are a German on the left and a Frenchman on the right.

The second illustration is taken from The Kipling Reader, a collection of stories written for young adults by Rudyard Kipling. It was published in 1908 and illustrated by J. Macfarlane. Kipling, one of the most popular British writers of the era (again this is the guy that wrote The Jungle Book), is best remembered for his strong support of imperialism and his glorification of the heroism of the British soldier in India and Burma. This particular illustration depicts Scott, a character in the story “William the Conqueror.” Set in India during a famine, the story centers on the romance between Scott and a young woman nicknamed “William” while they toil to save Indians from starvation. Scott has saved hundreds of babies by feeding them milk from a herd of goats he has managed to maintain. In this illustration, he approaches William, who sees “a young man, beautiful as Paris, a god in a halo of gold dust, walking slowly at the head of his flocks, while at his knee ran small naked Cupids.”

The third illustration is an advertisement for Lipton Teas, which appeared in 1897 in the popular weekly the Illustrated London News. The Lipton Company was founded in Glasgow, Scotland, by the son of a poor Irish shopkeeper, Thomas Lipton. He opened a small food shop in Glasgow in 1871 and by 1890 owned 300 food stores throughout Great Britain. In 1890 the multimillionaire decided to cash in on the British taste for tea. Growing tea on plantations he owned in India and Ceylon and marketing it in inexpensive small packets that guaranteed freshness, the Lipton Company soon became synonymous with tea drinking throughout Europe and the United States. Advertisements for its tea appeared regularly in the Illustrated London News during the 1890s and early 1900s.

The fourth and fifth illustrations are cartoons published in the popular English humor magazine Punch, founded in 1841. Although noted for its political radicalism in its early years, by the late nineteenth century Punch had adopted a more moderate political stance, one that reflected the perspectives of its largely middle-class readers. The first cartoon, “On the Swoop,” was published in 1894, a time when the European powers were consolidating their territorial claims in Africa. It shows an eagle, representing Germany, about to pounce on an African village. By then it was clear that the German acquisition of Tanganyika had ruined the British imperialists’ dream of establishing a string of contiguous British colonies in east Africa that stretched from Cairo in Egypt to Cape Town in South Africa. In the second cartoon, “Britannia and Her Suitors,” was published in 1901, a time when Great Britain was still studiously avoiding entanglements in the diplomatic alliances then taking shape among the continental powers. It shows Britannia dancing with a figure representing its colonies, while in the background the German emperor Wilhelm II, then allied only with weak Austria-Hungary, look on unhappily. Further in the background Tsar Nicholas II of Russia dances with a figure representing France, with whom Russia had been allied since 1894.

After you have studied the illustrations, I would like you to think about and discuss the following: What view of Africans and Asians are being communicated in each of the illustrations? What message is being communicated about the benefits colonial subjects are accruing from their status? What images are communicated about the British in their role as imperialists? What concrete examples of nationalism can you see in the various illustrations? How many of the justifications for imperialism presented in Jules Ferry's speech can you find represented in the illustrations? Using evidence in the illustrations alone, what conclusions can you draw about the reasons for imperialism’s popularity within the general British population? Your thoughts…

11 comments:

Lora Persyn said...

What surpirses me is that the writers of these children's books are already communicating to these children things like "Look how awesome we are, we have colonies!", like the whole "I is for India, our land in the east". And when the Englishman is talking to a man in Africa. In the tea advertisment all the workers were Africa, so it's like, "We abolished slavery but they still need something to do so they can work for us here!" Was this whole system of Indentured Servitude in practice in African colonies too Mr. Prill? As far as the benefits of colonies, I don't see a lot of them being portrayed besides the fact that Britain can show of all of its colonies to other European countries like in the last cartoon. What's with taht? Do they only have colonies to show off? Was it that big of a competition? There's capitolism again. I'm predicting a war pretty soon. The nationalism is huge in the children's book, like in the words N describing the navy and W describing honesty, even Jules Ferry blatantly said that higher aces (French) have a duty to bring "Civilization" to lower races. Dang, humans can gind a way to justify anything.

TmcC said...

I find it most interesting that they're teaching imperialism to kids. The Lipton Tea ad. shows a bunch of Indians working on the harvesting and processing of tea as where the Brit is just "supervising"

Anonymous said...

Looking at and thinking about this made me wonder how much the average British citizen knew about imperialism and its effects. Obviously they would realize the benefits like having rubber for their cars and other luxury products like that but I just think that some of the common citizens might have said something about the way people in other countries were being treated. But then again these people probably would have been thrown in jail or something like that and would have not been able to express their ideas.

Ji Young Chung said...

What were they teaching babies????
to kill and make people miserable and shoot tigers??????????? This is horrible!!! Is this one of the reason that people are getting more corrupt and inhumane? This is not patriotism but 100% arrogance and insolence! This shocked me almost to death! and the Lipton picture; there are Indians woking on the plantation over looked by White men. I think that's crazy; why emphasize a country's vulgarness as if it was something to be proud of? And the bird cartoon, colonies are represented as if they were mere food, profit. The last one is a little bit nicer i guess, portraying Britain's love for their colonies and their profits. But still what a insane (although quite good) metaphor!

These pictures shows how the british thought of Africa a nd Asia as a possession where they can profit easily with good raw materials and free labor from the natives. The benefits were shown as something so valuable and precious like the last picture. THe British were dictator. Something indescribable, a tyrant perhaps. And in the ABC pictures, nationalism is shown by telling the kids how great and powerful and magnificant Britain is.

The Jules Ferry document is similar to the illustrations from the second sentence. "Promoting a wast extension of the French colonial empire." Also, competition is shown in both of these docs.(letter N) the importance and the affect of the market is shown(lipton ad). And "We must say openly that indeed the higher races have a right over the lower races ...."???? what???????? i'm going to go crazy! (the Kipling piture and the picture with the condor). this document is insane inhumane and heartless. Competition among states is killing people, destroying a prestigious countries. I am definitely horrified and incensed at the ineffable plebeian event.

Alina said...

they almost glamorize it, which is also something done today in the media or in movies. they make it seem like we're being the best, which they use to appeal to the english citizens. also, with the thing about "what the british say, they do," that's like trying to make themselves seem almost noble or cool for not beating around the bush, and leaving out the terrible things that come with it. like saying oh we take them over, but we don't hurt them, which is obviously a lie.

and of course having fun new products to sell wouldn't get the english people to against it.

Alina said...

they almost glamorize it, which is also something done today in the media or in movies. they make it seem like we're being the best, which they use to appeal to the english citizens. also, with the thing about "what the british say, they do," that's like trying to make themselves seem almost noble or cool for not beating around the bush, and leaving out the terrible things that come with it. like saying oh we take them over, but we don't hurt them, which is obviously a lie.

and of course having fun new products to sell wouldn't get the english people to against it.

Anonymous said...

these pictures make africans look absoutely helpless!! its awful!! the lipton tea advertisement even shows africans as the ones moving all the boxes of the tea and being the slaves working the machines and whatnot and slavery was supposed to be outlawed by now! but yet people accept the ad and buy the tea! and people are still buying it! now granted the ads have changed but still! and the eagle swooping down on the africans makes the africans look like they are helpless incompetant people who cant think for themselves! it does show though how europe is just swooping in without the africans permission or their knowledge of it...this stuff makes me sick

Electra Fox said...

Dear lord, this is terrible. In the picture for tea it wasn’t even trying to show the workers as happy or healthy (as is usually done today). I don’t get how the people of industrialized countries could sit back and let this happen as they saw in everyday adds the forced labor that allowed for their fancy goods. Then there is the white man just sitting back and letting the people work. That add is a really good representation of what people who were westernized took as every day life.

Anonymous said...

i cannot believe that the advertises can use sch things by showing people actually working and pushing things as a way to sell theirr products. how come no one noticed the cruelty in the advertise back then. the little britsh song for each alphabet...wow! how could they tech their kids things like tht..it kind of justputs the whole thing out there about britsh colonialism. it's supposed to be a fun?!? way to teach kids?!?!?!?!

Anonymous said...

Prill, when you showed me this Lipton advertisment i couldnt believe that it was "Ok" for an image like that help out a company of any kind.

Mr.Curtis said...

I think the all the pics were full of propaganda. The one where the whiteman is leading all of the poor uncivilized africans is to much.