Friday, February 6, 2009

The Decades of Imperialism in Africa

I would like for you all to read four documents that all date from the period 1880 to 1910 (you can read all four documents by clicking here). This was the “great age” of European imperialism in Africa, when virtually all available territory was swept up by the British, French, Germans, or Belgians. African political and economic life was transformed by the inescapable European presence.

The first document comes from German Southwest Africa. It is unusual because it was written in Swahili by an African trader. A prosaic account of theft on a trip to an inland tribal village, the statement shows how some Africans and their new rulers could interact to apparent mutual benefit.

The second document briefly describes the new work system the Europeans brought. It uses the derogatory term kaffir, taken from the Arab word for pagan, to describe labor in the British-controlled mines in South Africa, while at the same time it claims great benefits from the jobs. The vantage point is that of an owner and Westerner. What might the workers have thought of this system?

The third document, also from British-controlled southern Africa, describes a characteristic legal arrangement used to deprive African chiefs of their land. It was carried through by agents of Cecil Rhodes. By granting full powers to the concession holders, this land-use agreement made later incorporation into the British Empire possible.

The fourth document, from French-held Mali in the region below the Sahara, was issued in 1890 by a French military commander who let no African stand in his way. The arrangement described was meant to regularize a local government, in part by playing different groups against each other, while disclaiming French power. What roles were reserved for the imperialist forces?

Collectively, the documents on the imperialist impact raise a number of basic questions. How did the Europeans view Africans at this point? How did imperialist penetration and controls compare with earlier colonial outposts that existed during Season 3? What accounts for the change? Finally, how would Africans perceive the new imperialism, and how might their reactions differ?

Imperialism is recent in African history. Understanding its impact, its limitations, and the responses it provoked is vital to a grasp of African patterns even after imperialism subsided. What gains did Europeans think they were bringing to Africa through imperialism? How did Europeans treat local rulers? Why did Europeans find it appropriate to relegate Africans to low-level, dangerous, and low-paying jobs? What is the evidence on this subject in the Kimberly mines document? What do these imperialist documents suggest about the effects of European conquest on Africa and Africans at the end of the 19th century? Your thoughts…

16 comments:

tori_freedman said...

Feelings of superiority by the Europeans over the Africans in the documents are obvious. The second document even states that the pagans were forced to work the "less responsible operations on the mines", like they were only smart enough to do labor intensive work, but the governing and leadership should be left to the Europeans. (*sarcasm* ...because African nations hadn't been able to govern themselves perfectly fine for hundreds of years and NEEDED European help...???!!)
The Europeans coming in thought they were "helping" these people...?! If anything, they just screwed everything up! Tribes and racial groups were mixed in mines, which caused conflict that still exists today. The French especially thought that they were doing the people of Segou a favor helping to "restore and oversee the government" (Doc 4) against the Tukolors, rather than taking it over completely (which they ended up doing anyway). European imperialism and nationalism unfortunately made the gap between core and periphery, or independence and dependence, that much greater.

Anonymous said...

In the third document, I found it interesting that the King was willing to sign a contract allowing the Europeans to colonize the area in exchange for guns and money. I wouldnt think he would let his own people become subjects but I guess he is just like every other corrupt ruler in world history.

Ji Young Chung said...

Africans were viewed by the Europeans almost as (sorry for this comparison) some kind of a bug. something easy to get rid of and something easy to get benefits (not bugs but anyways. Africans were treated as some baricade that blocked whatever Europe was trying to do. The imperialist penetration differed greatly by season 4 people having FIREPOWERS which improved during the industrial revolution. The africans were certainly scared. Europeans did whatever they wanted to do like mix up 10 to 14 different racial groups in to one mining group which probalby caused tension. Taking lands away; killing pepole
and thinking they are better and superior than the Africans??? (Its ironic how people now say that humans came from Africa; they were the ones who were mistreated massively.)
Que horible!

Taylor Hammond said...

I was wondering about the debate on wednesday do the questions have to be typed as well?

Ben Doty said...

The first document was very sad because the Africans had lost all hope. It seemed that everything they had once knowmwas gone and taken. They were forced out of their homeland and forced to move on with very little to start with. They felt as if they had been betrayed by everyone that they had faith in and trusted. The second document outlines the amount and variety of workers that the Europeans had on the diamond fields. He also makes it very clear that the Africans were not benefiting by trade in any way because the Europeans were just taking the natives. This shows the new mindset that Europe has, that they can do anything without permission. The third document soundds like the British are giving the AFricans guns so they will fight against some of their fellow brothers. Europeans are now addicted to colonizing nations because it is God's destiny. On the other hand, the Africans are getting their homelands taken away and their hopess and dreams crushed.

Prill said...

everything must be typed yes.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Prill how would I go about getting that picture of the two kids that have their arms cut off from the rubber plantations. I need it for my debate.??

Prill said...

google "belgian congo brutality"

Anonymous said...

mr.prill,

i have a couple of questions for the debate(i'm proimperialism in egypt)

my document says "Exotic institutions have sprung up and have taken root in the country. The capitulations impair those rights of internal sovereignty which are enjoyed by rulers or legislatures of most states."

what does he mean by exotic instituions? and by capitulations does he mean that the use of capitalism took rights of the rulers in the economy? i just wanna make sure i dont right anyting wrong...thanks!

The Odyssey said...

in that second document i believe it was where the man is talkin about how his cousin is dead or something and hopes his soul isnt taken well anyways that whole passage showed me how there were so many deaths and humans like me and you were being killed or fmily members and it was just very sad to think about it. and these europeans are dumb to think they made things better i mean come on u even said in class they would put tribes together just so they would fight cuz they knew they hated each other!!! thats ridiculous and cruel and messed up all at the same time

Henry A. said...

In middle school the only teach the Europe's perspective of how it went down. Its truly sickening to see Africas view on it. Cutting off their arms because they werent going fast enough. what are they gonna do with one armed slaves? its truly digusting

RachaelGarton said...

The Europeans obviously feel very superior to the Africans. They felt like they were the residing body and government, and that the African government was voided by their very presence. An example of this would be in the first document- when the Africans go to the German "ruler" after they go to their own leader. The German leader asks why the Africans did not come to him first.
The other documents continue to show how the Europeans treat the Africans as (basically) slaves. They use them solely for their own gain (document 2- forcing them to work in diamond mines & document 3- pretty much turning them against each other)

RachaelGarton said...

Mr. Prill, I need help finding other documents relating to my debate topic (pro-German imperialism) I found this one document, but any suggestions on where I should look for others?????

Prill said...

miss garton, check out a document called "racism, militarism, and the new nationalism" dated january 29th. it's a german classic.

KelseyBengochea said...

ok so obviously the europeans feel very superios to Africans... they have the attitude that Africans NEED the europeans to survive...

Anonymous said...

I think that the Europeans thought they were responsible for civilizing and controlling the people. There main goal was to get cheap labor and cheap raw materials in order for them to prosper. It is obvious that the Europeans didnt think high of the natives which would increase social tension. I dont think the Europeans completely screwed everything up, but they were being greedy and only things that would benefit them and them alone. All people have a greedy side, Im sure if the peoples status was switched and the Europeans were the "non civilized" They would have been taken advantage of. Its human nature, and the strong natured ones are the ones that go against the grain and are more selfless.