Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Toussaint L’Ouverture—“The Liberator Hero”

Well ladies and gentlemen, isn’t the Haitian Revolution everything I pumped it up to be? And more! At the moment, I want to focus on the most notable figure of the revolution, Toussaint L’Ouverture. François-Dominique Toussaint à Bréda was born on May 20, 1743, on the Bréda plantation in Saint-Domingue. The oldest of eight children, Toussaint’s father had been born in Africa, captured in a war, and sold into slavery in the New World. Taught to read and write by a Roman Catholic priest, Toussaint was given more and more responsibility on the plantation until he was made coachman and livestock steward; the plantation’s overseer (the owner lived in Paris) gave him forty acres and thirteen slaves to manage. Permitted to marry (a rarity for slaves in Saint-Domingue), Toussaint wed Suzanne Simone Baptiste, and the union produced two sons. Therefore, although Toussaint was technically a slave and no manumission papers ever were drawn up, essentially he was looked upon and treated as a free man (affranchi).

When the slave rebellion first broke out in August 1791, Toussaint played only a minor role and was believed to be conservative in his thinking (he had helped his plantation’s white factor, or agent, escape from a mob of ex-slaves). Gradually his powerful and articulate speeches to the troops (Toussaint spoke both the Creole patois and his father’s African tribal language, in addition to French) and his charisma, tactical genius, and emphasis on training and discipline lifted him to the position of commander of the rebellion.

Seeing an opportunity to drive the French from Saint-Domingue, Toussaint briefly sided with the Spanish. It was at this time that he wrote a letter to blacks and signed it Toussaint L’Ouverture, which means the opening. “I thought it was a good name for bravery,” Toussaint reflected. But when he learned that the National Convention in Paris had abolished slavery (in February 1794), he switched sides and led his army against the Spanish and the British invaders, both of whom gave up the fight. In 1796, Toussaint was named lieutenant governor of Saint-Domingue, in 1800 he put down an uprising of the mulattoes, and in 1801 he issued a constitution for the republic.

And yet Toussaint believed that Haiti’s economic future was tied to that of France. In 1802, Napoleon Bonaparte revived French ambitions for an empire in the Western Hemisphere. Intending to reap enormous profits from the sugar and coffee trade and determined to restore slavery in order to do it, Napoleon sent a French invading army to the island in 1802. When the French army invaded the island in 1802, Toussaint, foolishly, was prepared to welcome it. His two sons were being educated in France (they were received by the Empress Josephine) and he had tried to convince the ex-slaves to adopt French ways (he criticized the low necklines of Haitian women’s dresses).

Tricked into surrendering, Toussaint was hustled off to a prison in France (Fort de Joux), where he died on April 7, 1803. His entreaties to meet with Napoleon had gone unheeded. Yet the Haitians ultimately won their independence from the French, and Toussaint L’Ouverture became the symbol of the revolution, the liberator-hero.

The French army, decimated by yellow fever, was forced to withdraw from Haiti, ending Napoleon’s dreams of an American empire. It was at that point that he offered to sell the Louisiana Territory to the United States. The Republic of Haiti (so named in 1804) had secured its independence, but the instability and terror of the revolution did not cease for decades.
No formal eulogy of Toussaint L’Ouverture is known to exist, and, since he died in a French prison, it is possible that none ever was delivered. The document I would like you to read, however, part of an 1814 manifesto written by Henri Christophe, is quite close to a eulogy (you can read it by clicking here, just read "Note C," pg. 326-329). A follower of Toussaint, Christophe was born in the British West Indies (either Grenada or St. Kitts), was taken to the French colony of Saint-Domingue, was sold to a free black who owned a stable, was permitted to purchase his freedom, and became a waiter in a hotel. In 1811, eight years after Toussaint’s death, Christophe proclaimed himself Henri I, King of Haiti. His 1814 manifesto was intended to rally Haitians to repulse a threatened French invasion of the island. What lessons did Christophe intend that his readers learn from the life of Toussaint? Toussaint attempted to create a Haiti in which whites, blacks, and mulattoes could live in freedom and relative equality (although the majority of former slaves wanted all whites out, which is largely what occured). What did Christophe think of Toussaint’s goal? Finally, what does Christophe see as the true meaning of the Haitian Revolution? Your thoughts...

37 comments:

Caleb Johnson said...

This was interesting to see the revolution from the slaves point of view. Christophe makes a point to say that Toussaint's goal was that everyone could live peacefully. He was not sparking the war, he had even saved his master from other slaves. The European stereotype of blacks being slaves kept them from seeing any reason in this and they didn't even give it a chance.

Anonymous said...

Christophe makes a point of showing how Toussaint's sympathy for the French landed him in a jail to starve and die. However, he still talks more about how Toussaint reinvigorated Haiti and led them through a pretty successful rebellion. One of the only downsides was that he never declared independence for Haiti, so the French were more inclined to go back and try to reclaim the colony.

hochanlee said...

I think the reason why in united states why the slave revolts were few and unsucessful. It was because there were a lot more whites than blacks, and there was not charistimatic leader like toussaint who was able to lead slaves to their victory

Anonymous said...

Sorry Mr. Prill this post has nothing to do with "TOUSSAINT l'OUVERTURE-"THE LIBERATOR HERO"

But...I got in this very large debate today about religous backgrounds and orgins.

I'll start with this...Wasn't Hinduism created as a response to the growing popularity of Mahayana Buddhism...It started with some great epic poems that were actually quite secular from the vedic age in order to appeal to the people of the INdian region ??? AM i making this up??
Which religion came first?


Also I mentioned to the person that China has always been quite secular and Buddhism didn't orginate in China like everyone thinks it did , it was actually rejected a few times.

But he didn't agree that China was secular and said that they have always worshipped their ancestors. But wasn't this due to Confucianist values(ex. submit to husbands/respect elders) that dominated Chinese society WHICh WAS A PHILOSOPHY created in response to the Period of Warring states along with Doism and Legalism. AM I MAKING THIS UP TOO??

Prill said...

yeah, you're largely on the right track miss beck... hinduism in its EMBRYONIC STAGE (aka hinduism before we actually call it such) existed in india before buddhism, but this was an earlier aryan version of the faith... hinduism as we know it today emerged in response, yes, to buddhist popularity... china is extremely secular, it always has been... ancestor worship does exist, but it's not like it is in sub-saharan africa... secular philosophies have always, and continue to, rule the social and cultural landscape of china

Spectre82 said...

He seems like a military genius. i love revolutions. because they bring people to forget their diferences(within their own race) to fight towards a common cause. Mr. Prill definetly convinced me today that the Haitian revolution was the most important revolution that happened. and Toussaint L'Ouverture was the man that led it all. Mostly.

cori kempshall said...

Ur post really makes me think Mr. Prill. I wonder what would have happened if Napoleon hadnt sold Louisiana to the USA. But majorly I wonder what would have happened if yellow fever hadnt wiped out the french army. Do you think that the Haitian's pride for their country still would have helped them win? man, this is interesting.

Prill said...

interesting indeed miss kempshall... wow! history is really now really all starting to come together isn't it? THE BEST IS STILL YET TO COME!!!

Macy Stucke said...

I think that Christophe thinks Toussaint was foolish for being tricked into going to France to be put in jail. However, he did think that he had a good goal and meant well. Haiti would not be where it is today without Toussaint. And I am totally convinced that the Haitian revolution is the most important revolution in the whole world.

Jordyn Farrell said...

He believed that all ties to your mother country must be cut, or you will continue to have an attachment to them. Also, he appears to believe that the Europeans, in the very least the French, are liars and traitors. But he also commends Toussaint for trying to get Haiti into a good governmental situation and having a fairly successful rebellion. It was almost like he saw the Revolution of Haiti as an act of payback, not an act of "freedom".

Brooke Sapp said...

Hm... I'm not sure if I get this but what I got out of it was that L'Ouverture was a good person and did try to have peace with two sides even though he was only on one. Seems like a good leader but a little too nonrealistic (idk if thats the right word) for thinking he could be friends with both the french and slaves. IDK! my thoughts are very hard to explain!! hahahaha.
-Sapp.

Alec Livaditis said...

Cristophe urged the people to take note of L'Ouverture's mistake in welcoming the French, and he called upon them to resist the French invasion and the reinstitution of slavery in Haiti. "While he was remaining peaceably... he was seized... The whole of Europe knows how he ended his unforunate career" Cristophe stated that L'Ouverture's weakness was his protection of colonists and faith in the French government. He says that L'Ouverture was criticised for being too partial to whites. He says that he even killed General Moise, his nephew, because he failed to carry out his orders to protect the colonists. Cristophe revealed that L'Ouverture, reinstituting education, revitalizing agriculture, and setting up industry, restored order. Cristophe thought the meaning of the revolution was independence from France and freedom of blacks. He portrays Napoleon as a tyrant who sent generals to Haiti to enslave heroes. He states that the French can't even manage to make alasting government in their own country.

Unknown said...

When Christophe said that all ties with their mother land must be cut (France), which is the same thing we talked about today in class, that even though L'Ouverture didn't even politically free them he sure gave them every necessity to do so politically. But since they were still somewhat attached, they became economically dependent on europe.

Do we have the essay tomorrow or Friday?

Prill said...

again, with the obama inauguration, everything got pushed down a day.

Alec Livaditis said...

No reading is on the schedule, and Comparitive essay is on Wed, which is why I asked if the essay was on Thursday or Friday. I assume there is no reading tonight.

Avni Patel said...

I think in some ways Chritophe liked the points and ways of Toussaint and other ways he didnt. He makes a point int he document about how he thought toussaint should have been more cautious in dealing with the French. Alos, he makes a point about how Toussaint's goal was to allow everyone to allow everyone to live peacefully with no slavery and no segregation.

xchelseaPEELEx said...

he definitely seemed to appreciate L'Ouverture's military genius and his contribution to black freedom, though his goal of equality was never met.

Prill said...

my calender has the essay scheduled for thursday, not wednesday, so with the inauguration, that get's pushed down to friday... no reading tonight, further discussion on nationalism tomorrow, and it's a BIGGIE!!!

Theresa Dang said...

It was pretty foolish of Christophe to probably think that nothing bad was going to happen when he got to Spain, but instead he got locked up in jail and died there. He also seemed to really believe that they should cut off all French ties because of the problems with them they had before. I'm not sure if Christophe was blaming Toussaint L'Ouverture for everything bad that happened, but at least Christophe gave him credit for wanting to end slavery

Kirsten said...

He wanted to show that the French had already fooled them once, and was trying to show them that even if they tried to comprimise the French like L'Ouverture did, the French will just take advantage of you.

alex bullock said...

it was very interesting learning about the Haitian Revolution in class. this shows the revolution from a slaves poin of view. L'Ouverture was a good person and military genius, that tried to have peace in his living environmment. it did not matter who you were in society. he was not trying to start a war. he was just standing up for what he thought was right. but honestly there was no way to be allies to the slaves and the French at the same time.

Kirsten said...

oh btw Prill on the calander you gave us, the essay's scheduled for wednesday

Prill said...

crap, so you guys didn't get the update with the nationalism lesson built in... err... well, again i've been announcing the essay for friday all week, so that's what it is (all dates are always subject to change)

Taylor Hammond said...

wow i really do think that learning about the haitian revolution has been the best by far! I hope that it can only get better from here!

amber toy said...

PRILL!!!
you know i never blog..but i had to do this one you talking about my people now:)
personally i think the haitian revolution was the most important revolution in history.what Toussaint wanted to achieve was equality for all in the land of haiti.but what he started was a contagious infection called "independence". It began a revolunary movement.and quite honestly i don't think most societies,like America, would be independent without the hatian revolution today. Coming from a haitin's prospective I think he accomplished his goal. Haitians all across the world are proud of their heritage good and bad, I think Toussaint has much thanks for that:)

Spectre82 said...

its a shame how we take our liberties, and our rights for granted. Toussaint was willing to fight for his people. he never gave up on them. its wierd how he disbanded his greater part of his troops so that they could cultivate food. thats how strong his confidence was in that he could actualy break away from France. amazing.

Prill said...

you'll have to give the essay a shot, and we'll see how it goes... nobody knows what the topic is anyway...

Tyler said...

Cristophe shows how L'Ouverture made many mistakes that lead to his death. The major one is when the French offer him a treaty but he gets tricked by the French and gets thrown in jail and later dies. This makes Napolean want to go back into Haiti and try to restore order. Luckly for Haiti he failed because of disease.

Henry A. said...

There is no doubt that the Haitan Rev. is the most important. The one thing that I can point out about all revolutions, they seem to unite everyone. Even if they don't know it.

Anonymous said...

The Haitian Revolution was truly the most powerful of the revolutions of the time. For one man to gain enough followers to overthrow an entire population and government, freeing slaves, is quite an influential guy. Toussaint L'Ouverture had angry slaves on his side to help him overthrow the government. When you have millions of people angry at the system, the system is going down. L'Ouverture's only mistake was going to France in pursuit of speaking with Napoleon. That got him killed.

amber toy said...

one more thing,,although Toussaint's plan to create equality for all was a smart plan his decision to meet with france was not.I think that Christophe commend Toussaint for his good deed but was disgusted in the dumb major decision he made.Which caused his death.

Anonymous said...

Toussaint L'Ouverture was a main leader of the slave reevolt. he wanted to improve the econonmy by eshtablishing commercial ties with Britian and the U.S.

I think its fascinating the see he transtition of a slave that was freed by his master turn into one of the best slave leaders, leading to a first slave victory ever in history. In a way Haiti greatly depended on him....after he was pcatured and died the economy of haiti suffers and still to this day Haiti remains a poor county....lagely due to resources that were either burned or destoryed by all the invading countires (British, French, Dutch)

Mr.Curtis said...

Toussaint L'ouverture was a smart person, with the exception of going to France to finish his life. His betrayal on the Spanish was a smart play, and the way that he was able to actually sucessfully revolt against the society that was him down made him even more of a hero.

Kevin_Shin said...

Toussaint Louverture truly was an amazing, charismatic leader. He lead the first successful slave revolt and tried to create peace between both countries at the same time. Christophe seeems to have said that Louverture was a bit foolish for falling into the
French's trap, but overall respects him for his good intentions.

Leeshah said...

Christophe seems to think highly og Toussaint's military leadership and plan. I think he though that Toussaint was smart and respectablee man but that he was a little too soft for the French. He seems to think that Toussaint fell too easily in the trap and maybe have been a little more hostile before going to make an agreement.

Ben Doty said...

Toussaint L'Ouverture's goal was to create a free and independent Haiti. He worked for the rights of all and tried to substantite themselves from the mother country, France. Once L'Ouvertuer was getting settled in he restored energy to law, education, religon, and industry. I think that the message was to inspire the people of Haiti to fight for their rights and for independence. He drew inspiration from L'Ouverture's display of courage and bravery to stand up to the French.

David Douglas said...

The Haitian Revolution was the most moving and eye-opening revolution i've heard/seen so far. Toussaint brought nationalism to its highest, and brought racial pride into the picture. He was the one that led the first successful slave revolt in all of world history, but was captured and died in prison. Like caleb points out, it shows a different story to it: it shows the P-O-V of the slaves. This "God of War" united people under the common goal of gaining black freedom, and an independent Haiti.