Convinced that détente and the Vietnam War had eroded American military strength and international prestige, Ronald Reagan took office determined to reverse these trends. He called for huge increases in defense spending and aggressively combated communism. Under a policy eventually known as the Reagan Doctrine, the United States began challenging communist insurgencies throughout the developing world, regardless of whether or not the Soviets were directly aiding these leftists. The policy led to a significant expansion of U.S. activism abroad, especially in Latin America. In the 1980s, the United States supported anti-communists in El Salvador and Nicaragua and deployed troops to oust the left government of Grenada.During Reagan’s first term, his militant anticommunism and Soviet aggression markedly increased Cold War tensions. In December 1981, the Soviets forced the communist government of Poland to impose martial law in order to quash the independent labor movement Solidarity. In September 1983, the Soviets destroyed a Korean airliner that strayed over Sakhalin Island. All 269 passengers, including 61 Americans, perished. At the same time, the Reagan administration began the most massive peacetime military build-up in history. Armed with secret intelligence showing grave weaknesses in the Soviet economy, U.S. officials concluded that the Soviets could not afford a renewed arms race.
Reagan’s strategy terrified and enraged his opponents. Critics howled when defense spending reached $40 million an hour at its peak. A massive anti-nuclear movement arose in Europe and the United States. In 1982, approximately one million protestors gathered for a “nuclear freeze” rally in New York’s Central Park, perhaps the largest demonstration ever.
Soviet-American relations were particularly bleak in March 1983. On March 8, Reagan gave a harshly anti-communist speech (that you can read or see by clicking here) before the National Association of Evangelicals. His uncompromising rhetoric received worldwide attention. Three weeks later, Reagan called for the development of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI or “Star Wars”), a system of lasers and satellites designed to prevent a nuclear missile strike. Although critics denounced the costs and technological flaws of Reagan’s proposal, the Soviets later identified SDI as a key factor in the eventual collapse of the Soviet Union. SDI, the explained, highlighted their economic and technological challenges.
During Reagan’s second term, Soviet-American relations dramatically improved. In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev became Soviet premier and ushered in a remarkable array of political and economic reforms. Tempering their initial suspicions of one another, Gorbachev and Reagan came extremely close to abolishing half of their nuclear arsenals at a 1986 nuclear summit in Reykjavik, Iceland. Although Reagan’s refusal to abandon SDI ended those discussions, they signed a sweeping arms agreement the following year. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty removed all intermediate-range nuclear missiles from Europe. By late 1991, the Iron Curtain would fall and the Soviet Union would cease to exist. While experts continue to debate Reagan’s role in ending the Cold War, his foreign policy was undoubtedly bold.
After reading Reagan’s “Evil Empire” speech, I would like you all to think about and discuss the following: How does Reagan characterize the Soviet Union? What does he believe is the proper response to communism? What are Reagan’s opinions of the nuclear arms race and the nuclear freeze movement? This speech drew heated criticism from some U.S. commentators. Anthony Lewis of the New York Times called it “primitive.” The renowned historian Henry Steele Commanger declared, “It was the worst presidential speech in American history, and I’ve read them all.” Do you agree or disagree with these remarks? Why? Your thoughts…

6 comments:
what i just saw in that speech was how much god was referenced! like it was of course also done in front of engelavists. but it just reminded me how much the u.s. would change it's culture just to seem different from the soviets, which of course included religion. like what i couldn't stop thinking of was how that all is still lasting, like with the pledge of allegiance (which if u think about it, it's strange as it seems like something that they would do in like totalitarian countries). this made me think of how hypocritical the u.s. was, and how the methods weren't working. like star wars ending the cold war, because that would bring peace.
Reagan characterizes the Soviet Union atheist sinners who lack morals because of their lack of religious belief. The proper response to Communism, according to Reagan is making America's spiritual sense stronger to combat Communism. The nuclear freeze movement would "be a fraud" according to Reagan, and the Soviets would carry on with proliferation because of impossibile verification.
This speech is very religious. It ignores the fact that Christianity is the only religion in America, and it esssesntially calls athiests evil people. Does a lack of belief in god make a person have no morals? Reagan is commencing a spiritual and military build-up. He uses Christianity in order to make the U.S. seem great, and the Soviets seem evil. The nuclear freeze movement is made out to be unpatriotic. Clearly the age of detente is no more when a nuclear freeze is opposed because the Americans don't trust the Soviets in recording their reductions and freeze efforts.
It is very odd how Reagan who began the largest peace-time military buildup in history, soon changes his tactics to SDI convincing the American people that he believes nuclear buildup is wrong and that America must take the challenge of making defense technologies. However, it is succesful in condemning the freeze movement because defense is more morally correct than offense. The "Star Wars" speech is also very interesting. No-one knew what the heck Reagan was talking about. All the technologies seemed so foreign and unattainable. The NYT responded:
“President Reagan's desire for a missile-proof shield around America and its allies expresses the deepest longing of the nuclear age - for a place to hide. But it remains a pipe dream, a projection of fantasy into policy”
This is why it was dubbed the "Star Wars" speech. Because of its craziness and fantasy-like goals.
I used a chapter of "Way Out There In The Blue" as a source for my paper and this topic is very interesting.
i agree with alina, God was mentioned alot in Reagans speech but u have to remember the times. this was also the time period of birth control being considered evil. its interesting to me how much the public has become libral. i mean we advertise birth control in magazines now. back then if a girl were to be pregnant they would be sent to a aunt in the midwest where they would be taking some "art school" while the her mother would shove a pillow underneath her stomach and one day the daughter would just return and live her life. so u cant help but realize that of course god would be talked about alot. and with the cold war part of his speech, the thing that caught my attention was he said that it was just a big misunderstanding! things that big dont just get misunderstood. and i also have a question about how he said something along the lines of the fact they were trying to negotiate a lessing of the arms race? when did this happen b/c i dont remember anyone trying to stop this arms race in fact i remember everyone wanting to increase the rate of production. how does that coralate?
I was shocked when Regean denounces secularlism. You really have to watch the speech to get the full feeling of it. And he goes on and on about how Christianity needs to be in schools and influence the gov. I'm reminded of the Lownes games last year when a prayer was said before the game(south ga for those who dont know). It was really strange.
we've "kept the torch of light and freedom"? hmmmm yeah
We can only find peace through making more weapons. and i like how he makes this all about religion and God, not saying our real motivation is preservation of capitalism.
He was talking about God so much and I didn't hear much of the Soviet Union. He talks first of America and God and America, that it is good. But he talking about the S.U. as an atheist country. They are talking no matter what good things they do, and they may have have strong voice, they are wrong, they don't have God with them. He set up a ramp to the issue he wants to state last. It then talks more of God that U.S.A. has 95% of people believing God and know the Ten Commandments by heart, and talks of a spiritual renewal, and a new morally superior U.S.A.
i think its creative how reagen attempts to convince america that god's got their back in anything that they do. He basically shot down the idea of seperation of church and state because it was somthing that the soviets did
Post a Comment