The last of the major Cold War conflicts took place in Afghanistan starting in 1979. After Islamic leaders took control of the country in response to a pro-Soviet coup the previous year in this formally non-aligned state, Soviet forces swept in to restore the communist government in Afghanistan. What the Soviet Union thought would be an easy battle became a 9 year long bloodbath that the Soviet government would consider, by 1986, too costly and unwinnable. Because the U.S. was still on a Cold War footing, even at this very late date, it lent its support to the mujahidin (literally, “Islamic warriors”) fighting against the Soviets, including a certain Saudi member by the name of Osama bin Laden. Although the U.S. did not send any of its troops into Afghanistan, the mujahidin would be supplied with state of the art training and weapons (including U.S. Stinger missiles). Along with the support, the U.S. promised support in rebuilding Afghanistan after war’s end. Sadly, such support never came because the U.S. quickly lost interest in Afghanistan after the Cold War had run its course, and the U.S. become vilified in the eyes of the mujahidin, a vilification that would eventually culminate in the attacks on New York and Washington on September 11, 2001.Although the U.S. generally kept quiet about its support for the mujahidin, there is an excess of documents that exist that prove that such support indeed took place. You can read a Soviet intelligence report from 09/01/80 by clicking here, as well as a report from 09/01/81 by clicking here, which describes the type of training that counterrevolutionaries were receiving from U.S. military personnel. In fact, by 1988, even President Ronald Reagan was open about U.S. support for the Mujahidin in his State of the Union Address (you can read that by clicking here; you don't have to read the whole thing, but please read his comments on the Mujahidin near the end of his speech).
You may also find it interesting to look at the BBC’s timeline of the war in Afghanistan by clicking here. You may also find it enlightening to read a BBC news article about the Taliban that was written in 1998 (by clicking here) and the dangerous threat the BBC reported Osama bin Laden to be as early as 1999 (by clicking here).
After reading the documents, I would like you all to think about and discuss the following: In what way are Afghan counterrevolutionaries being trained according to Soviet intelligence reports? What type of warfare are they being taught? What kinds of weapons are being used? What types of characters are being trained by U.S. forces? Is the U.S. responsible for training terrorists during the Cold War? By 1988, was the U.S. any longer secretive of its support of the mujahidin in Afghanistan? What does Reagan specifically state in the latter part of his State of the Union Address? What is your opinion of U.S. support of the mujahidin during the war? Do you feel that our Cold War policies there backfired in the end? Why or why not? Has U.S. Cold War foreign policy caused foreign policy issues for the country in the early part of the 21st century? Your thoughts…

9 comments:
since the U.S. supported the Mujahidin, we trained them. We gave them our most sophisticated weapons ( stinger missle ) and the most training. eventually the soviet union pulled out. the afghanistan war was equal to our Vietnam to the S.U. they were economically devistated. in the end we did not co e through with our support to the Taliban leadership. they got mad and opened their arms to terrorists groups. resulting in 9-11-2001. a sad and devastating day for the U.S., where this was the begining of revenge for the Taliban.
Reagan mentioned in his state of the union address that the reason the US supported the Mujahidin is because they were freedom fighters fighting for self- determination. He says that "their cause is our cause: freedom." This seems a little interesting because the real reason the US supported the Mujahidin was anti- Soviet ambitions and it turns out these people who Reagan called freedom fighters are the same people that we call terrorists today.
I'm just curious, about how much weapons do they have and how long is there shelf life. would those stinger missiles be expired? of have they gotten bigger and better weapons now? Its nerve racking knowing that because of something that happened 30 years ago could end the life of the next generation or the generation after that etc. I dont understand how we could be so selfish to not just rebuild afganistan. If we did, we wouldnt be under this threat today. it is a scary thing. the lesson is: dont promise anything that you cant/wont follow through on. Stupid mistake!
If you ask me, i think, with emphasis, that we should have stayed and helped the Mujahidin to create a stable goverment!!!!!!!
Afghans are being trained on their own soil. The United States has come in and built training centers with American advisers who teach these Afghans "the tactics and methods of waging guerilla warfare. After training, the personnel who have received the highest marks are sent to the US for one year to continue training." Many new weapons were being given for Afghan use like "Kalashnikov rifles, ground-to-air missiles, light anti-aircraft weapons, explosives, and mines with a timing device" that are not only being supplied by the U.S. directly, but by other countries in Western Europe, Pakistan, and Egypt. U.S. forces are teaching characters "subversive operations and the participation of individual countries in organizing the rebel movement on DRA territory. In particular, the training of saboteurs and terrorists is done in the FRG where by the end of 1980 a number of centers operate to teach guerilla warfare methods to Pakistani servicemen and persons of Afghan nationality. The period of training is set at 1.5 months. In the first half of September the next group of saboteurs flew to the FRG for training." I think the U.S. was very responsible for forming terrorists. U.S. introduced these ideas of terrorism and put weapons in their hands. You can't give people new, strong weapons, make them promises then break them. Things will turn bad, as we have already seen as a result in 2001. In 1988, the U.S. is no longer hiding their support. Reagan says exactly "We support the Mujahidin." He says the freedom fighters there are meant to keep peace and we will keep on fighting for them until the gain "genuine self-determination." Reagan also mentions how Afghanistan isn't the only place fighting for freedom and how "Their cause is our cause: freedom." Really? If we're such big supporters of freedom, then why don't we stick around to help Afghanistan after they are in a mess after the war? Oh because we already got we wanted, the Soviet Union losing.
I also read the BBC articles. Whoa, the Taleban is pretty harsh, especially when they're dealing with women. They strictly enforce Islamic ideas and girls aren't even allowed to go to school or have health care? Lame. And apparently, the Taleban has no international recognition and are forced to hand over Osama bin Laden, who is a guest in their country. Osama bin Laden may be welcomed in Afghanistan, but due to his accused bombings of U.S. embassies in Kneya and Tanzania, he is on the FBI's Most Wanted list.
omg! Mr. prill. I just got my laptop back so i can get on more often!!! The lecture today connected so many things from the past to the future. It kills me that we taught Osama bin laden to fight and gave him weapons and then deserted afgahnistan, betraying our promise and not expect them to be pissed and back fire! 9-11 was a result.
The reports say that the Afghan soldiers are being trained in Guerilla warfare. Isn't that like shooting and running? A definite advantage if you know the territory better than your enemies. I noticed that "Interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign member state of the UN" wasn't really legal unitl the U.S. started handing over money, a month after they had begun training. Is "interfering" just giving financial support? I don't understand.
It seems like a lot over of the counterrevolutionaries are coming from Pakistan, as all the training is going on in Peshawar. What kind of weapons are the U.S. sending? EXPENSIVE ones. $4,500,000!
There was specific terrorist training for them? How ironic.
The Afghan counterrevolutionaries were being taught like americans and given american weapons. My opinion on the reasons why the U.S. interfered in this war and supporting the Mujahidin is that one of the main reasons they entered was to get back at the soviets which is childish. Why risk lives for spite? This whole conflict we are in now with Afghanistan might of been able to be completely avoided. i hope i said that right.
yeah we basically had everything coming to us from the beginning.. we put OUR weapons in there hands to help fight the SU and we gave them OUR word to help them through whatever and blah blah blah.. but to make the story short, we broke a promise to afganistan which made them want revenge (which i dont blame them) 9/11 occured and now we are in war with them now.. so yeah
Post a Comment