he was like ruler(i think) of germany. and he 'ditched' russia becuase they were so far behind technologically. and he allied with austria. and he was the person who fleed like 3 days before the end of WWI. (resulting in democratic germany)
That is talking about the war in the countries with the people of the countries. So like patriotism, nationalism with the people. there was more hatred b/w the civilians of countries than the solidiers.
Kaiser Wilhelm 2 was the last king of germany and he gave up his position a couple of days before the war was ended because he didnt want the peoples hatred after telling them that germany was winning and he'd have to admit that they lost. so he pushed the power over to a weak and new democracy, who got blamed for making germany loose the war.
Pan slavism was just a name for slavic nationalism. Nicholis had no choice, with so much mutiny in the army he could not put down the rebellions. Roosevelt put a lot of money into Latin America trying to keep their economy up, in reality he just didn't want any conlicts.
Kerensky was the prime minister before the coming of lenin into power. He ruled with the provisional gov. which was supported by the Petrograd soviets at first but then put down by the people. as a weakness due to its non fullfilemtn of promises. They didn't get Russia out of the war like they were supposed to. They were a weak gov. because russsia had no experience with a gov other than absolute monarchy. they weren't able to make the right decisions which led to the workers, military, sailors, and other soviets revolt.
when solviets abdicated Tsar Nick II, they replaced the govt with LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC ("provisional gov't") Kerensky was leader; 2 mistakes 1-didn't pull out of war 2- didn't redistribute land
well slavic nationalism was practically the trigger of all. It was the newly ottoman freed serbian gov. trying to get all the slavic nation to get together, especially the slavs from austria. they were behind the black hand who assasianted the arch duke.
Archduke Ferdinand was the austria/hungaryian next in line to throne who went to visit Bulgaria (slavic) and who was assassinated by the black hand. His death triggered the anger of the austrian gov. to mess with the serbians cause they knew that serbia was behind the black hand and the assasination. this led to russians getting involved to support the serbians and the germans to get involve and help the austrians. so on and so forth...
um yeah it was supposed to be but as the Serbian gov. wanted the combination of bulgaria and serbia, they supported the black hand who wanted to get out of austria. so they were kinda together and for the same cause.
schiefflen plan was by the germans in the beginning of the war. it was their strategy to send their full force to france first cause they think that the russians are going to take forever to mobilize,so by the time the russians come germany would have gotten rid of france, but it didn't take russia too long so germany had to split army and fight at two fronts.
ah ha! GB+FR+ RuSsIa + ItAlY + US=alliance Gm+Aust +ItAlY +Ottoman/turkey= entente this is basically how jess just explained it to me. okay. but the mixed caps are out of or changed sides. this still right?
The Indian National Congress was supported by hindus and muslims to get self-rule by collaborating with the britsh at first, but after the war they opposed the british completely. The nationalists drew encouragement from the fourteen pts and lenin/marx.
I think yankee imperialism was what countries in latin america called it when the US tried to "help" them in the early 20th century. Many saw the US's control as unwanted imperialism instead of help.
Socialism is more of an economic thing whereas communism is a economic and political thing. Communists want to get rid of capitalism completely(like stalin), while socialism wants to keep capitalism a small part of the economy (like lenin wanted)
isn't socialism when the government owns and regulates everything, but in communism [it's supposed] to be where the population owns everything and shares it amongst themselves?
the may 4th movement was a movement in china where the scholars and college students marched through to show hatred towards foreign influence in china.
the muslim league was the in india and they wanted independence but they were afraid that if they got independence the hindus would control everything.
the balfour declaration was when the british promised an independent state for the jews in palestine. [but didn't keep the promise because they made the same promise to the arabs.]
Having everything devoted to war like factories are forced to make clothes and weapons for the soldiers and food production goes up to feed soldiers over seas.
total war...that's when your entire country (men, women, children) is involved with the war with either actual fighting on the front, propaganda, making war supplies, etc. During total war, the gov't takes control of everything.
total war is when anything the country does is somehow effecting or helping the war. the country becomes totally for the war supporting their side and theuir economy and production is based on supplies for war. there is no difference b/w the combaters and the civilians.
Chiang Kaishek ended the good realationship of communism with the guomingdang and so he focused on the guomingdang only. He throws the communists out of china. He wanted to launch political and military expeditions, the northern expeditions, that aimed to unify the nation.
im not sure if there is another country following keyenes cause. wouldn't the spending of money in the world war II bring out the keyenes idea more, so wouldn't the countries involved in that follow him, like Great Britain maybe?
126 comments:
Who was Kaiser Wilhelm II?
he was like ruler(i think) of germany. and he 'ditched' russia becuase they were so far behind technologically. and he allied with austria. and he was the person who fleed like 3 days before the end of WWI. (resulting in democratic germany)
can someone explain what
HOME FRONT is?
That is talking about the war in the countries with the people of the countries. So like patriotism, nationalism with the people. there was more hatred b/w the civilians of countries than the solidiers.
Kaiser Wilhelm 2 was the last king of germany and he gave up his position a couple of days before the war was ended because he didnt want the peoples hatred after telling them that germany was winning and he'd have to admit that they lost. so he pushed the power over to a weak and new democracy, who got blamed for making germany loose the war.
WHAT IS
KERENSKY'S PROVISIONAL GOV'T??
Pan-Slavism anyone??
And Why exactly did Tsar Nicholas II abdicate the throne??
"Good Neighbor Policy?
Pan slavism was just a name for slavic nationalism.
Nicholis had no choice, with so much mutiny in the army he could not put down the rebellions.
Roosevelt put a lot of money into Latin America trying to keep their economy up, in reality he just didn't want any conlicts.
Kerensky was the prime minister before the coming of lenin into power. He ruled with the provisional gov. which was supported by the Petrograd soviets at first but then put down by the people. as a weakness due to its non fullfilemtn of promises. They didn't get Russia out of the war like they were supposed to. They were a weak gov. because russsia had no experience with a gov other than absolute monarchy. they weren't able to make the right decisions which led to the workers, military, sailors, and other soviets revolt.
thanks
Tsar Nicholas II was forced off the throne by the provisional gov. and he had no choice due to the rebellions.
just kidding- found it
when solviets abdicated Tsar Nick II, they replaced the govt with LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC ("provisional gov't")
Kerensky was leader;
2 mistakes
1-didn't pull out of war
2- didn't redistribute land
thanks anyways :)
can u describe slavic naionalism?
Slavic Nationalism-
stressed culture of ALL slav ppls. Lands like Austria-Hungary promoted seccession.
well slavic nationalism was practically the trigger of all. It was the newly ottoman freed serbian gov. trying to get all the slavic nation to get together, especially the slavs from austria. they were behind the black hand who assasianted the arch duke.
ahisma?
satyagraha?
Ahimsa= Ghandi's saying of nonviolence to gain success.
Sayagraha= Ghandi's passive resistence of truth and firmness.
who is Archduke Franz / Francis Ferdinand
wait- i thought that the black hand was slavic but not backed by the serbian gov, wasnt it its own organization?
Thanks Nid-hi
Theresa-
He was the duke form Austria who visited Bosnia (who wanted independence) and got assassinated by the Black Hand.
Ferdinand was the 2nd in line to the austrian throne and was assassinated by the black hand, austria blamed the slavs and war began
Archduke Ferdinand was the austria/hungaryian next in line to throne who went to visit Bulgaria (slavic) and who was assassinated by the black hand. His death triggered the anger of the austrian gov. to mess with the serbians cause they knew that serbia was behind the black hand and the assasination. this led to russians getting involved to support the serbians and the germans to get involve and help the austrians. so on and so forth...
Does V.I. Lenin just mean Lenin?
earlier i meant not backed by the other slavs, i wasnt thinking srry
self-determination was when Wislson said to allow all ethnicities the right to have their own government right?
vanessa,
um yeah it was supposed to be but as the Serbian gov. wanted the combination of bulgaria and serbia, they supported the black hand who wanted to get out of austria. so they were kinda together and for the same cause.
wait.. slavs = serbs????? i no thats stupid but now im confused. is bbosnia serbian or slavic? or both
and yes nicole ur right
Right jessica, allow all nations to form their own state.
nicole, V.I.Lenin, stands for Vladimir (i donno what i is) Lenin.
yes that means Vladamir I. Lenin
Yes Nicole
Yes Jessica
Vanessa,
yes, slavs=serbs
oh, got it. lol...
jes, call?
alright nessa,
Serbia = gov. seperated from ottomans.
slavic= ethnicity that the serbians and the bosnians are.
Bosnia= in Austria but slavic
that all equals Bosnia wanting to seperate from the austrian gov. and join slavic serbian friends.
does that make sense?
bosnia not bulgaria
ferdinand visited bosnia didnt he? (thats wat my notes say.... and the net)
yeah thats what i said, bosnia...bulgaria is somewhere else..
thanks nid-hi
Yes ferdinand visited Bosnia and got shot by the Black Hand.
ok, so GB+France+Italy+russ= alliance
GERm+ Aust+___=entente
(gez this is like the south park athiest alliance thing)
help...
oh my bad i said bulgaria before, i meant bosnia...im really really sorry. too many B's
not really nicole:
Germany + Austria + Italy = Alliance
France + Britain + Russia = Entete
what was the schlieffen plan?
Nid-hi
that's also what I have.
no nidhi its the other way around.
Schleiffen Plan-
Germany's plan to take Paris before Russia had time to get ready on the western front. Didn't work, Russia was too quick.
Jess-
my notes say Nid-hi is right.
schiefflen plan was by the germans in the beginning of the war. it was their strategy to send their full force to france first cause they think that the russians are going to take forever to mobilize,so by the time the russians come germany would have gotten rid of france, but it didn't take russia too long so germany had to split army and fight at two fronts.
Land and liberty = Russia or Mexico?
no it says in the book that the allies are GB, france and italy (and russia) and the entente is germany, austria annd ottomans
ah ha!
GB+FR+ RuSsIa + ItAlY + US=alliance
Gm+Aust +ItAlY +Ottoman/turkey= entente
this is basically how jess just explained it to me. okay. but the mixed caps are out of or changed sides.
this still right?
Entente= Britian, France, and russia in the beginning and japan joined and us and italy
alliance = germany, austria-hungary and italy, italy left later
the entente are called the allies but the central powers are what the triple alliance are called..allies and alliance are different.
OH! that's stupid. why not have the same names.
lora,
mexico= "land and liberty"
ENTENTE= FRANCE BRITAIN AND RUSSIA (THE NAME IS FRENCH)
ALLIANCE(NOT ALLIES) = GERMANY, AUSTRIA-HUNGARY, AND ITALY
not being rude, but thats how it is
Gratias Nid-hi
lora u said it correctly..
You're not rude Nessa.
It needed to be said.
ahhhh!! confused! allies-entente?
alliance= central power?
nicole what u just wrote is absolutely positively correct..:)
Off to NLE study time
and math midterm
and Gatsby test
and essay
Grrrr....
possibly back later
thanks :)
anyone have a really short sum up of lenin?
I know Mussolini, but what is 1l Duce?
i think its like his name as a leader..ill duce in italian means that leader so its jsut referring to him as a leader.
Lenin was a communist of the bolshevik party, and he brought out the russians from war and made the NEP.
whats kristallnacht?
thats the official attack of jew synagouges and jewish businesses.
wilson's 14 points? where at least in our notes is that?
Indian National Congress. I don't have much on that. nationalism in India? Gandhi?
Its in the part about the treaties, out of the fourteen pts, the m ajor ones were:
- self-determination
- formation of an association of nations.
The Indian National Congress was supported by hindus and muslims to get self-rule by collaborating with the britsh at first, but after the war they opposed the british completely. The nationalists drew encouragement from the fourteen pts and lenin/marx.
Whats "dollar diplomacy" vs. "yankee inperialism"?
Dollar diplomacy was the process of giving a lot of foreign loans to countries in Latin America.
I couldn't find yankee imperialism anywhere.
thanks Nidhi! one sec, i'm looking
thanks lora!
I don't know. dinner. bbs
what other treaties are there besides
versaille
brest-litovsk
sevres
???
I think yankee imperialism was what countries in latin america called it when the US tried to "help" them in the early 20th century. Many saw the US's control as unwanted imperialism instead of help.
i donno of any others..
oh..ok..thanx,cody.
ok guys (Nidhi) hehe...several questions!!!
What is the difference between BOLSHEVIKS and SOVIETS???
also...
THE BIG FOUR AT THE PEACE CONf.??
GREAT BRITAIN+U.S.+ FRANCE+_______
Japan? Italy?
and also..
When did the USSR come into play...under Lenin or STALIN??
and last question hehe...
KRISTALLNACHT??
alright Ashley:
Bolsheviks were a part of the soviets they were a different party in the soviet.
The big 4 are britain, U.S, France, and Italy.
USSR came when lenin came.
Kristallnacht is the attack on jews synagouge and businesses.
who was opposite the central powers?
this discussion has confused a lot, but here it is:
The central powers = the triple alliance.
against them were
the allies = the triple entente
oh thank you so much.
i couldnt think of any of their names for the life of me.
but that clearied it up :]
can someone explain the difference between
SOCIALISM and COMMUNISM ???
Socialism is more of an economic thing whereas communism is a economic and political thing. Communists want to get rid of capitalism completely(like stalin), while socialism wants to keep capitalism a small part of the economy (like lenin wanted)
isn't socialism when the government owns and regulates everything, but in communism [it's supposed] to be where the population owns everything and shares it amongst themselves?
ohohoh. can someone help with the muslim league?
for some reason i can't find it in mah notes. :/
what is the treaty of brest-litovsk???
and the may 4th movement? (something to do with china, i think...)
nevermind about the treaty, i found that (:
but the may 4th movement???
http://www.marxmail.org/faq/socialism_and_communism.htm
^ Difference between ^
the may 4th movement was a movement in china where the scholars and college students marched through to show hatred towards foreign influence in china.
the muslim league was the in india and they wanted independence but they were afraid that if they got independence the hindus would control everything.
the balfour declaration was by balfour who during the war, promised the jews a homeland in palestein.
the balfour declaration was when the british promised an independent state for the jews in palestine. [but didn't keep the promise because they made the same promise to the arabs.]
do we need to know anything else about mustard gas other than that it was new chemical warfare?
i dont think so monica...
I know that mustard gas causes bleeding and attacks the bronchial tubes so its a slow and torturous deathso proved that life in the trenches was hell
thanks a bunch! [:
Total war?
Having everything devoted to war like factories are forced to make clothes and weapons for the soldiers and food production goes up to feed soldiers over seas.
total war...that's when your entire country (men, women, children) is involved with the war with either actual fighting on the front, propaganda, making war supplies, etc. During total war, the gov't takes control of everything.
total war is when anything the country does is somehow effecting or helping the war. the country becomes totally for the war supporting their side and theuir economy and production is based on supplies for war. there is no difference b/w the combaters and the civilians.
Who did Prill say employed Keynesian economics aside from the U.S.?
anyone know what we need to know about chiang kai-shek? do we need to know details, or just basic stuff?
Chiang Kaishek ended the good realationship of communism with the guomingdang and so he focused on the guomingdang only. He throws the communists out of china. He wanted to launch political and military expeditions, the northern expeditions, that aimed to unify the nation.
ankur,
im not sure if there is another country following keyenes cause. wouldn't the spending of money in the world war II bring out the keyenes idea more, so wouldn't the countries involved in that follow him, like Great Britain maybe?
idk, maybe. but i think i remember prill comparing it with another gov't. w/e...i'll ask tomorrow
K Good Luck everyone! Pce
i'm tired of studying for like 5 hours..
Goodnight, everybody!!
oh yeah! and good luck!!
maybe you're thinking of the Prill comparing that plan to what our plan is now...
YAYAYAYAYYAYAYAYAYAAYYAYAYAYA.....AP WORLD!!!!! NETHERLANDS!!!!!YEAHHHHHH!!!!!TEST GOING TO BE SO EASY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yea im so ready
no clues for the essay tomorrow?lol
but its a change over time right?
yeah, a change over time... having read recent documents should be rather help... studying your rubric as well
hey Mr.P,
I'm studying for hte essay tommorrow and I had a question:
what would be a political continuity in europe or latin america?
Hey Mr. Prill, do we have reading for tomorrow?
yes
Sorry, I don't have my calendar with me, what pages?
1013-1014; 1032-1037
Post a Comment