Thursday, November 6, 2008

The Andean Kingdom of Chuquito in 1567

So today we move south into the Andes Mountains region of South America to examine the Inca empire on the eve of invasion. The Inca Empire began in 1438 when Incan armies subdued their home area of Cuzco in the highlands of southwestern Peru and ended with the conquest of Quito [Ecuador] in the 1520s. By the early 16th cenury, the Incan Empire stretched from Quito in the north to Chile in the south. The majority of the empire's 6 million inhabitants lived in the ares of present-day Peru and Bolivia. Three hundred years earlier the Incas were a small village community competing with other villages in the highlands of Cuzco. During the expansionary period, the Incas employed their traditional highland social practices as the model for imperial organization. The ayllu, the smallest Andean social unit, functioned on the basis of communal ownership of land, communal work practices and strong traditions of mutual aid for those unable to work. But ayllus, for many generations before the Incas began their imperial expansion, were also part of larger units, or chiefdom's. The organization of the chiefdom reflected a strong awareness of the economic potential of diverse ecological zones in the Andean area and revealed how the patterns of obligations to the chief enable maximum exploitation of these areas. In the highlands (altiplano) staple products consisted of potatoes, quinua [a type of grain that only thrives in highland areas and is also known as Altiplano rice], and llama and alpaca products. In lower areas on the Pacific coast and in semitropical valleys off the eastern escarpment of the Andean range, staple products consist of maize, cotton, fruits, and coca (used for chewing and in rituals). The economic goal of a highland chiefdom was to control as many ecological zones as possible. This same goal lay behind the Incan system of governance. The noteworthy characteristics of the Inca Empire, including forced migrations of people, road and bridge building, served not only to unite the empire but also to produce and distribute good from all ecological zones.

The Kingdom of Chuquito was a pre-Inca chiefdom located on the western shore of Lake Titicaca that was subsequently incorporated into the Inca Empire. A Spanish governmental inquiry of 1567 that I would like you to read clearly showed how the traditional patterns of obligations owed to the chief contributed to exploitation of various ecological zones. In order to verify accounts, Spanish officials took testimony not only from the chief but also from his subjects. You can read excerpts from this document by clicking here. Once you have read the document, I would like you to think about and discuss: What types of work and goods constituted tribute in Chuquito? What practices indicated that the relationship between the subjects and the chief was reciprocal? Compare Aztec methods of acquiring tribute to the methods used by the chiefs of Chuquito. What are the differences? What might account for the differences? A tribute system reveals the basic forms of social stratification. What are they in Chuquito? How do they compare to social stratification in Babylonia, India, Mediterranean area and China? Your thoughts...

13 comments:

Hannah Greenberg said...

yoo prill,
I know this is totally off topic but are we gonna sell some of our cookies for our cookie-palooza tomm? I need to know if i should bake a billion or a substantially smaller amount and how many people to bug and how often. Where would we sell them anyway? During AP world classes :p?

Lora Persyn said...

Quick essay question Mr. Prill. In the Inca society was it only peasants that paid tribute through labor or was this practiced in all social classes?

Lora Persyn said...

one more question, also on the Incas: We said women weren't looked at as important as men because of the military influence, but then what did women do?

Lora Persyn said...

where did the Inca's get their military from? Peasant labor? Or were certain people trained like the aztecs?

Prill said...

it's difficult to know that EXACT role of women with the scanty documents available. here's what we do know: some were taken as concubines and temple servants, but they were theoretically equal and interdependent, parallel descent is in play here like in mayan society... again, not much. in terms of military, every male in inca society had military training. let's move this conversation out of here though. i'll put up a post where you can ask questions.

Prill said...

i don't think we'll be able to sell greenberg b/c i never got school permission, and i think i need to. so just bake enough for the team.

Anonymous said...

Prill are we not having like a little study session online for our essay tomorrow??

I was really looking forward to it. :(

Prill said...

the new post is up and running miss beck.

Anonymous said...

I think that this shows how advanced the Inca were. Even before the Inca came around, tributes were being paid to major cities of the area. The amount of tribute that each was required to be given by each region was set so that each region knew their requirements. I think this is why the Inca were able to have such successful tributary relationships with surrounding areas.

hochanlee said...

Hmm this seems interesting. I feel ashamed right now for when i was in elementary school i was to learn that these were pretty barbaric people. Now it dosen't i feel really bad

Spectre82 said...

I couldnt look at the aztec document because it wouldn't open, so now i am going to say what i think about the inca system. The incas to me had a pretty good system of tributes going. they didnt have to use any force, unlike the aztecs which used a great amount of force. The demanded food as potatoes, and people to gaurd sheep. I think that they had a special part of society put away for people to work on the government land.

The Odyssey said...

this should how andvanced the incas were compared to the aztecs. there was no forced used what so ever to pay these tributaries... but the aztecs had to have alot of force for people to pay them

Ji Young Chung said...

This document is ironic because the Indians were supposed to pay the tributes but the government was also giving them food, shelter and clothing for them to spend while they make these products. This is like the governments paying one to recieve tax money.
Unlike the Aztecs the government was too nice to the citizens because the Aztecs used more fear and force to make their citizens pay the tributes (the one who didnt' pay the tributes ended up as sacrices). This is really weird because the Incans had more centralized government and elaborate bureaucracy with a semi-divine ruler. I was expecting more respect and more tributes without any exceptions in Incan society. Also, it is absolutely not similar with the Chinese government especially in Qin dynasty because they used absolute force, if the Chinese got angry because the government did not foods and other stuff they would probably be dead.
The reason for Incans' expansion was due to, i think, nice government, I think because people were paid to do what they were supposed to do, they were able to keep the people in order.