The age of Justinian was pivotal in the history of the Byzantine Empire. The last of the emperors of Constantinople to speak Latin as his native tongue, Justinian attempted to reconquer the West from the various Germanic tribes that had divided it into competing kingdoms. Justinian's forces invaded Italy in 535 in order to wrest it from the Ostrogoths, who had controlled the peninsula since the late fifth century. The war that ensued was protracted, bitter, and destructive. When fighting finally ceased in 553, the Ostrogoths had been eliminated as a recognizable culture, and Rome's aristocratic families likewise had disappeared from the historical record. Cities, towns, and countryside alike were in ruin. Fifteen years later, in 568, new Germanic invaders, the Lombards, carved out their own kingdom in northern Italy and several smaller, semi-independent states in parts of central and southern Italy, thereby denying Byzantium control over the entire peninsula. In effect, Justinian's attempt at reconquest enjoyed only limited, short-term success. Its major accomplishment was transforming Rome and much of Italy into a war-ravaged backwater and stripping the eastern empire of much-needed resources. After Justinian's age, the Greek-speaking emperors and people of Constantinople were forced to look less to the West and more toward their eastern, southern, and northern borders, thereby accelerating the impact of Asian influences on Byzantium's cultural development.For all of his large-scale miscalculations, however, Justinian ranks as one of Byzantium's greatest emperors. Indeed, he often is referred to as Justinian the Great, the last Roman and first Byzantine emperor. A measure of that greatness is seen in the portrait mosaics of Justinian and Empress Theodora at the Church of San Vitale in Ravenna, Italy.
Created in 548 following the capture of Ravenna by imperial troops, the two mosaics flank the altar of the church. High above the altar is a mosaic of Christ in Glory. Below and to Christ's right is Justinian's mosaic (which you can see in greater detail by clicking here); opposite and to Christ's left is Theodora's mosaic (which you can see in detail by clicking here). In Justinian's mosaic we see the crowned emperor, his head surrounded by a nimbus, or halo, a sign of sacred power. He wears imperial purple and gold and carries, as an offering, the eucharistic bread, which a priest will transform at mass into the Body of Christ. On his left are four individuals: three church-men and what appears to be a court official (the person in the background). The clerics are Maximian, archbishop of Ravenna (his name appears over his head, he holds a cross, and he wears around his shoulders an archbishop's pallium, a long white cloth with an embroidered cross), and two priests. One priest holds a book of Gospels (every mass has a gospel reading from the same side of the alter on which Justinian's mosaic is located); the other holds an incense burner. On the emperor's right stand two high-ranking imperial officials and six members of the imperial bodyguard, known as the Praetorian Guard. One of the guardsmen displays a shield with the chi-rho monogram: the Greek letters X (chi) and P (rho), which when combined represent the word Christos (Christ). Empress Theodora, Justinian's wife, also appears with a crown, imperial purple and gold robes, and a halo. The hem of her robe has an image of the Three Kings bearing gifts to the Christ child. In her hands is a golden, bejeweled cup containing the eucharistic wine, which a priest will transform at mass into the Blood of Christ. On her left are seven court ladies, in descending order of rank. The one closest to her wears the purple of the imperial family. Two high-ranking civil officials stand on her right. One pulls back a curtain to reveal a baptismal font, the fountain in which persons are baptized into the Church.
Please take the time to look at these mosaics, and then while you are doing so, I would like you all to think about and discuss the following: Theodora's mosaic places her into a definite space: an imperial palace (or possibly a church). Justinian's mosaic lacks any spatial points of reference. Does this seem significant? If so, how do you interpret the emperor's lack of specific place? Based on these two mosaics, please describe the place that Empress Theodora apparently held within the empire. What was her theoretical position? What do you think were her actual powers? As always, be as specific as possible. "The Byzantine emperor was perceived as the living image of God on Earth, insofar as his imperial majesty was a pale reflection of the Glory of God. As such, he was the link between the Roman Christian people and their God." In light of these mosaics, please comment in depth on this anonymous statement. Finally, we see clear evidence of caesaropapism in both mosaics with the halos behind the heads of Justinian and Theodora. I want you to consider the future implications of the caesaropapist view. What are the pros and cons of caesaropapism? What about the pros and cons of political-religious separation? Your thoughts...

15 comments:
In both mosaics, Justinian and Theodora are about the same size. They also both have a Halo around there heads. It these show that they both had about the same power even though Justinian was the emperor.Caesaropapism is good in a way because it brings more control to the head authority, and so there isn't as much of a chance of religious rebellion
i think the fact that theodora is actually in a place shows that she actually knows what she wants and what she needs to do. you told us the story of what happened when there was that riot, and she was the one who knew what to do. it kinda shows that she had more direction.
the only pro of caesopoprism comes for the ruler and the people who support him. it allows him to have an easier rule. the problem with it is if a ruler comes that sucks, but it's hard to get him out because people thinks he has divine rule. it affects people down the road because of the idea being used again, and due to the idea keeping people in office who of course affect the future of the country.
well in theodoras portrait it looks like the person with halo is a woman and in the othe rone it is man... the positioning of people in each one is different... in theodoras she is like the biggest one and in th eother they are all equal but the man is in the center
Justinian's mosaic has him in the center, which shows that he is the main focus. However, Theodora also is (mostly)in the center as well... this places the importance of the rulers, showing that caesaropapism was a main idea in that time period and valued as a legit system. Becically, Justinian put himself and his wife as the main focus, even setting them as "holy". He was able to do so with the help of caesaropapism, because he was the emperor and had the power at that time.
The mosiacs, even though seperate show that Justinian and Theodora were very equal in ruling religiously, but maybe not so much politically. The two components of mass are bread and wine. Justinian has the bread, and Theodora the wine. Justinian seems to be in a place of more power...if that makes sense. He is only standing with important people and with the preatorian guard in full armor next to him.
Whereas Theodora is standing with women from many different ranks, so it is clear the Justinian was still seen as the more powerful one. The fact that many people were around him also may have something to do with most people seeing him as the connection between the roman people and God.
Maybe, for Justinian, he does not have a background to be symbolic for him to be around all? If he is invisioned as being so near to God, then wouldn't he be just as enveloping? They may have placed Theodora in a church because she is not the male God, as well as that Mary was earthly...although she was often refrenced in heaven. She could be representative of the more human, church oriented people, rather than the divine? The people also knew her to be the true leader, and maybe respected her for it by placing more in her mosiac. I think she ruled beside Justinian in equal matters, he was just the speaker and figurehead. They are both shown in the purple robes and each have a halo. They were seen nearly, if not entirely the same by the people.
i think it is really cool that men and women were kind of equal. not that i agree with theodoras back ground or justinians politics, i just think it shows a different kind of society when theodora was actually viewed as empress and she had influence over what happened. i like that.
(thats probably why byzantine empire lasyed so long :]....women)....jk(but not really)
In the anonymous statement, it is almost making the emperor to a partial God, almost like Jesus. You would think that the Christians would not like that at all. But this is a show of caesaropapism in that he is above all human laws. Also, the mosaic shows Justinian surrounded by people of military, religion, and political background. This also shows the caesaropapism in his reign. There are not really many benefits to caesaropapism, except for the fact that politics and religion are united under one leader, but the leader can take advantage of his power to control and do whatever he wants.
well, both of these show a large amount of caeserpatism, but in these mosaics, it kind of looks like Theodora is a little bit more powerful, or more influential in the Bzyantine empire. By putting her in a sacred church, and putting Justinian in so real signifugant place, it shows that maybe she was much more well liked, and probabaly more influencial on the poeple of the empire. This is really different from the powerful empires before this, and i think the first we have seen where a woman has really been a main focus, along with a male. Thats what i get from the mosaics.
In the Byzantine Empire, women had authority. Theodora was really the "man in the relationship". she knew what had to be done and did it. Justinian was the emperor but his wife pushed him to do what was right. by the way she grew up, she knew what people were like so she was the brains behind this empire. i agree with cameron that that is why it lasted so long.
hahaha. GO THEODORA!!! finally, a mosaic with equallity1 actually, i loved the expression on Theodora, like a "you-better-know-your-place" look. hahaha. and HIS look was like the artist was forced to make him look majestic...not working so well though...
I think that Theodora's mosaic shows her background a lot- she didn't grow up in a palace with high-ranking people like Justinian did and the mosaic shows her with people of many ranks like Lora said. The fact that Justinian didn't have a defined place might mean that he didn't have power over just one specific area, he had power over pretty much everything.
So both pictures have a lot of people around Justinian and Theodora with a halo around their head. It seems that they are treated equal and have the same amount of because they are both in the middle of the picture. However, Theodora's picture shows more of who she is. It shows her background, home, and lifestyle. In Justinian's picture, all you see are priests and warriors/guards. It makes it seem like he is always serious and very much dedicated to being a ruler.
The halo around their head shows that they were both considered to be divine, but not necessarilly equal. I think that the people respected Justinian more, but Justinian respected Theodora more, so all the words were commands were coming out of his mouth, but they might not necessarilly have been his own words.
The mosaics that show that Justinian and Theodora seemed to have the same amount of control because of their size and such shown on them. People realized that Theodora wasn't just Justinian's wife and had no ability to rule. She was the real "brains of the operation." Justinian was practically her little puppet. She could talk him into doing just about anything which was quite a good thing in the case that Justinian didn't seem all that bright with ruling, so Theodora definitely was able to help him maintain popularity with the people.
Caesaropapism isn't exactly the best thing in my opinion. It really gives the ruler too much power. Now that they're already in charge of a region, they're in charge of their beliefs as well? And as Mr. Prill mentioned in class, most were illiterate as well as being unable to interpret the language in which their holy text was written in. So this means that the rulers were then able to manipulate the thinking of their people to get them to do things their way rather than to do what is best for the people. On the other hand, it did give people a sense of unity. Mr. Prill also mentioned how rulers use religious views to gain political support. Also, if people believe their ruler has divine right, it is not as likely for there to be some kind of revolt to one whom is appointed by God to rule.
Post a Comment