As Olaudah Equiano’s memoirs reveal, the road to slavery in the Americas for millions of Africans began in thousands of inland villages where, as a result of military defeat, slave raids, or the decision of a chieftain or king, they were wrenched from their homes and marched to a slave market on the coast. There, while they were herded together in closely guarded holding pens or prison-like structures, complex and sometimes lengthy business negotiations took place between European merchants whose ships lay anchored off the coast and African slave merchants, many of whom were kings or major chieftains. Many European merchants recorded their experiences in such negotiations in memoirs or journals, and their recollections provide a wealth of information about the economics of the slave trade. They also offer many insights into how African and European slave traders viewed each other and their profession. They reveal that for millions of Africans the transatlantic slave trade was a nightmare, but for many others—Europeans, Americans, Africans, and indirectly even Asians—it was one more way to make a profit in an increasingly commercialized world.Thomas Phillips, the author of the document I would like you to read (you can do so by clicking here; for whatever reason there are two blank pages before the last page, just scroll down, and sorry about the formatting) about a slave voyage from England to Africa to the Barbados Islands in the Caribbean in 1693 and 1694, was an English merchant. In 1693, he purchased the slave ship Hannibal in partnership with a number of London merchants who were members of the Royal African Company, a trading company chartered by King Charles II in 1672. The Hannibal, along with five other ships, departed England late in 1693 for Whydah, a kingdom on the Guinea Coast, which is located in the modern nation of Benin some 200 miles east of the city of Lagos, Nigeria. Whydah, the coastal village where the king resided, was rapidly developing into a major slave market and had been the site of an English trading station, or “factory,” since 1682. The events Phillips describes took place in May 1694.
After reading the document, I would like you all to consider and discuss the following: What evidence does the document provide about the attitudes of the Whydah king and nobility toward Europeans? Did they consider themselves equal, inferior, or superior to Europeans? What do Phillips’ words and actions reveal a bout his views of Africans? What does the source reveal about Africans as businessmen? What did they hope to gain from trading with Europeans? How would you describe their business methods? What can you infer from Phillips’ account about the impact of the Whydah slave trade on Africa’s interior? What individuals or groups of individuals benefited economically from the slave trade? Did Asians in fact benefit? Finally, compare the attitude toward slavery of the king of Whydah and his nobility with those of King Afonso of Kongo some 200 years earlier. How might one account for these differences?

24 comments:
It's amazing how a european even describes the process involved in slave trade. It is disturbing how they cut off limbs from the captives just to make them afraid of you. I know i would.
Wow. You wouldn't think a European would care very much about slaves because they were the slave traders, yet Phillips says things like "whites are no better than blacks but see it that way because they ARE white." He wouldn't cut off anyones limbs because he knew it was wrong. He also said things like "it only had to do with the climate that they were so dark-skinned." It's nice to think that SOME people were kindhearted. It's aweful how the slaves would hate leaving their homes so much that they would drown themselves. Also, I don't understand how commanders could cut off slaves' limbs. I know it was to prove a point to other slaves so they wouldn't get out-of-hand but still.
In this article you see the workings of the slave trade on both sides on how the Africans had developed ways to seel more slaves at higher prices by shaving them to get rid of grey hair and saying that some of the worst slaves were that of the Kings. The Europeans also had some tricks like not disclosing how much of certain items they had on board in order to get rid of things of lesser value like cloth instead of cowries. What astounds me the most is that only half of the slaves that he departed from Africa with lived. It just makes you sick to hear this complete disregard for human life.
i guess this shows that not all europeans were slavery supporters, well the author explains all the abd things about slavery, and he feels that they are equal. we cant always call them cruel!
The Europeans had to pay respects to the King the first day they landed. The Europeans didn't want to offend the king or deny any of their customs. The English said they had great affection for the King for their fair and just dealings, and the King said the same (but the English noted that he wasn't always honest and I'm sure the Whydah King would say the same thing). The English noted that the African nobles were very sneaky because they made all the slaves shave to make the old look younger. But on the other hand, the English pretended to have less valueable cargo then they really did in order to get more slaves.
I was really interested about the resistence of the slaves and accounts of when they would drown themselves in order to avoid slavery.
"They having a more dreadful apprehension of Barbadoes than we can have of hell, tho' in reality they live much better there than in their own country"
This just shows you the true attitude of the Europeans toward the Africans and their homeland. They believed that slavery in the Carribean was better than the lives they lived in their previous homes.
That's absolutely disgusting how everyone, even the African king, treats these people as nothing more than a commodity. True, this man didn't support slavery as much as others, but even he talks about it like it's necessary, like it's alright to treat people like worse than animals. this is probably thanks to the mindset of the time period, but still. And slicing limbs off innocent people to scare others??? we wouldn't even do that to ANIMALS! what is this?
The King of course is treated better than all. It says that they have to buy the kings slaves even though they look bad. and they have to pay a higher price for it. And there is definitely all politics and economics going into this. They let the slaves stretch out a bit on deck but thats so they don't look bad or become sick and not healthy.If people thought the Mongols were Barbaric then they need too find a much more intense word to describe the people who sell humans. This should never be considered even remotely normal.
The Whydah king and the Europeans seemed to have a relationship making them both equals as they were both respectful towards each other.
Obviously, Phillips' wasn't all that in favor of the poor treatment of the Africans on the ship. He described how horrible it was to see them go through such pain and misery and how Europeans had a tendency of making the slaves look much more appealing than they are after having them stored as cargo for such a long period of time to trick customers into thinking that they were better than the rest and therefore should pay more for them. At the end of the document, he mentions how he is forced to promise to come back and do the same thing the following trip. Clearly, he isn't in charge of what he does. Someone has power over him controlling his participation in this slave trade. He definitely sees the hardships of the Africans and feels pity for them rather than seeing them just as possessions like most merchants did at the time.
its is true that all europeans dont all believe in slavery. this document shows that. he says that blacks and whites are equal. i mean it is disguisting to know slaves would rather drown then be on that ship. wow! captains would cut off slaves' limbs to prove a point to the others and keep them in line.
its is true that all europeans dont all believe in slavery. this document shows that. he says that blacks and whites are equal. i mean it is disguisting to know slaves would rather drown then be on that ship. wow! captains would cut off slaves' limbs to prove a point to the others and keep them in line.
I am surprised that a European would care so much about the slaves that he was transporting. He speaks of the slaves as if they are equals to him. This shows that not all Europeans thought they were better than the blacks.
These documents prove that there are different views on slavery from europeans. some see it as necessary for economic growth and others just see it as what it is.....cuel and unnecessary.
The Whydah King feels completly equal to the European King because he wishes them to buy his best slaves, which they know were not the best, for much more then should have been paid for them.
I really like Phillips, at least to the extent that can be like by someone involved here. He sees that the slaves and all others are equal, in that they are all human. He believes that God placed them in that particular climate, which turned their skin dark and made them hated, just as Phillips was placed in a cooler climate and his skin was whiter, and that that is no reason to condemn another. But it is a way of the time and knowone wants to be put on the other side and that since it is good for THEM, they don't care so much. He is a generally good guy, but knows it is wrong...yet still does nothing but buy slaves. At least he treats them as well as he can, by giving them food they like, not chopping off their legs to escape, and letting them exersize and sunlight. although those could also be reasons for himself, being that sunlight keeps them strong, the beans keep them from 'going' all over the place, and the not chopping off legs is so that they can work and be resold. Merchants benefited from reselling the slaves and plantation owners benefited from buying slaves to produce goods to sell...etc. chain.
I liked how Phillips said they saw hell as the place they were going and that they saw their devil as white skinned. That is really fascinating! I guess he was just blending religions to say that or got it from those who had converted and blended, or maybe he just said it because he knows how harsh and cruel the white people were to them and used it in his own contex.
Mr. Prill!!!! This document wouldnt come up!!! !!!!!!!
miss white, you're going to have to download the latest version of adobe reader.
i have a question. why would these slave traders treat them so bad that only half would survive, wouldn't it just be better it they treated them well so that they could survive and get more money?
In this document, Phillips talks a lot about the money and the business transactions of the slave trade. He mentions meeting with the king of Whydah and discussing the amounts that he will pay for the slaves. While he is talking, there are armed guards which shows the want for guns in Africa. It was also interesting that he discussed the price of women and children because usually everybody wanted men, except in North America. Once the slaves were purchased, they were checked to make sure they would make a good slave. Then they were transported to the boat and intimidated so they would not try and escape. In the middle of the document, Phillips expresses his opinion. He personally didn't agree with their treatment just because of a different skin color.
They Africans considered themselves equal to that of the Europeans, or atleast they pretended too.
The Africans acted like business men when they weren't honest and tried to conceal the identities of the slaves they were selling. Their business methods were dishonest to some extent, but it wasn't like the Europeans werent doing it anyways.
These people were heartless. Obviously out of their minds. The process that Europeans go through to make a slave look better (ex. oiling the body & shaving grey hairs) is almost like what people now do to cars. How were these slave traders so inhumane??? Ironing ship numbers to a person? Cutting off arms or legs? Just for money? These Europeans who were dealing were (although this is horrible diction) "good businessmen" (just in terms of commerce_). They started off by "not offending the king"
When i read this i automatically stared singing.."How could you be so heartless." Just a little Kanye West..
but on the serious side..i still dont see as to how humans can get so caught up in making more money to the point where we would take other human beings and treat them like dogs, or even polish them up liek a car.. as if they had no feelings at all..
dang. so this guy actually did not agree with slavery. it's quite strange to hear this from a European, instead of a former-slave, but still. i do have a question though. this document is so controversial, and i don't think that many people during the time would approve of cutting the limbs of the slaves, even if they thought of them just as animals. so did he have this printed when he was alive, or did somebody just find it, because i would also think that he could get in trouble for this by the government. especially because he is more on the "Against" side, rather than fighting on the side that most of the Europeans would fight on. It's quite intriguing.
Its weird to read this article for me. It nice to see a European who did see Africans as equal to white people but it seems to me that he thinks that slavery is still ok. When he says talks about how the slaves drown themselves but they don't realize that slavery is better than their own land just seems like he doesn't truly realize how bad slavery is. Yes, their king is selling them, but don't the Europeans still treat them worse than the slave traders in Africa?
I don't know if anything I said makes sense but it does in my head =]
Sapp
Wow, all I'm thinking is that all people werent cruel, there were kindhearted and thought people. Reading that people would cut off people's limbs and all that just disturbs me.. it's just so cruel. & That was just to get the slaves scared... WOW.
Dang... I read and I thought of what they said was pretty similar to a sweathouse. I guess the guys thought of them as objects, or rather not guess but they did, and seeing how terrible the conditions were, I see that the Europeans wanted to spend as little as possible and didn't care any for the slaves well-being. I bet pigs would've been treated better than this. This is what us humans do, and though it is sad and think of them and pity them, it's still going on. This is sick... oh how guns change the world so much.
Post a Comment